My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0912
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0912
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 10:34:29 AM
Creation date
10/6/2016 9:31:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/12/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 12, 2016 <br />Page 19 <br /> <br />what he wishes in accordance with the laws of the City of Roseville. He opined <br />this petition is a direct attack on his rights as a legal option within the city of Ro- <br />seville and his rights would be damaged by not allowing this subdivision. <br /> <br />Mr. Koland stated his concern that this petition specifically and unfairly and, in <br />his opinion, illegally discriminates against one pair of home owners. However, it <br />does not address other sorts of runoff that are impactful to lots in this area, which <br />include as stated in the Council’s minutes, a 2,500 square foot patio that’s being <br />added and does not require a permit in Roseville. He pointed out no one has <br />talked about that except for the engineering report. In addition, neighbors have <br />built sheds and replaced track driveways and sealcoated driveways that have add- <br />ed to impervious surface. Another consideration is potential additions to homes, <br />future outbuildings, or any modifications, because this petition does not require or <br />does not look for any remedy from them, just from a single homeowner. <br /> <br />Mr. Koland commented on changes to the large watershed outside of Gluek Lane, <br />noting Gluek Lane is 41 acres and the watershed is 120 acres. Gluek Lane is 34% <br />of the water that goes into that yet the petition did not address any of that water. <br /> <br />Mr. Koland stated if the residents are concerned about drainage in the neighbor- <br />hood, there are actions they can take to install a raingarden. He noted Coun- <br />cilmember McGehee had commented on the beauty of the raingarden at Corpus <br />Kristi and displayed a colored photograph of the raingarden he has had for over <br />four years. He stated the Rice Creek Watershed District visited them recently to <br />talk about basins, conduct infiltration tests, and had commented on how well his <br />drainage basin actually works as infiltration is less than 24 hours and the Rice <br />Creek Watershed District Code is 48 hours. <br /> <br />Mr. Koland commented there are other simple things beyond building raingardens <br />that the neighborhood could do. He displayed a picture of a well-cared for lawn <br />and catch basin covered with a pile of leaves that remained three days after a <br />storm event, noting that the simple act of clearing storm water drains can actually <br />do a lot of good things. <br /> <br />In closing, Mr. Koland respectfully asked the City Council to approve this lawful- <br />ly compliant proposal for a minor subdivision. As noted in public hearing notice, <br />the City Council’s role is to determine the facts associated with a particular re- <br />quest and apply those facts to a relevant legal standard contained within the City <br />Code and law. He noted the City staff has recommended approval and opined he <br />has met or exceeded all of the requirements. <br /> <br />Mr. Koland stated when he bought this home he conducted due diligence and had <br />asked the person he bought the home from if she would mind if they split the lot <br />and she said it doesn’t bother her at all. She actually went to the City Planning <br />Department at that time and staff said that’s something you can do but it has to be <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.