CC_Minutes_2016_0912 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, September 12, 2016 Page 2 Another member of that same Task Force quit because of her anger over the handling of the County Road C2 construction. Ms. Ramundt stated other concerns are that Walmart was built despite strong objections from the community and the Twin Lakes Neighbor- hood Association was formed to fight a parkway and is struggling because they felt they were not heard even after organizing. Ms. Ramundt suggested that instead of debating whether these projects should have moved forward or not, or debating about specific pro- jects, especially since some members were not on the Council at that time, the Council provide multiple and historical examples that could be used to evaluate how the City Council has made decisions that affect Roseville residents. Ms. Ramundt stated she does not socialize with any on the Council but has had conversations or exchanged e-mails with most of the Council at some time, which leads her to believe that, in general, each are a decent caring individual. She stated she has been struggling to understand what happens when the Council gets together as a group to make decisions for Roseville resi- dents. Ms. Ramundt stated when she has come before the Council the past three times regarding the formal complaint process, the Council was, at best, slow to react and now the City is left with a resident with a restraining order and an unflattering article in a ma- jor metropolitan newspaper. She stated she loves the City and knows we can do better. Ms. Ramundt stated in looking at the composition of the Council there is an engineer, a marketing person, a teacher, a realtor, and a retiree. She suspects that none have been of- fered a class or seminar on conflict resolution, which she thinks would be very valuable. She stated her belief that if the Council had the right tools, it would do things differently. At a minimum, she suggested when making decisions where residents have expressed strong disagreement, the Council would and should publicly respond to specific concerns from residents so they know they have been heard, using language such as: ‘We have heard and understand the concerns expressed by ‘X’ number of residents who currently reside on County Road C2 and that extending County Road C2 will negatively impact their housing values by ‘X’ dollars of percent. We have read the reports on Walmart that show it will increase crime in our neighborhood by ‘X’ percent.’ Ms. Ramundt stated people want to know that they have been heard. Then the Council would and should pro- vide clear rationale for their decisions including addressing resident concerns such as: ‘Although County Road C2 will negatively impact the housing values of current resi- dents, we are going to move forward with that construction because...’ ‘We are going to accept the risk of increased crime due to Walmart because…’ Ms. Ramundt stated our residents are intelligent and according to the article, even above average and mature. Residents know every decision will not go the way they want; how- ever, if the Council can’t or are not willing to provide the rationale for their decisions, it suggests the Council is not confident they are making the right decision for the right rea- sons. Ms. Ramundt continued stating she has been before the Council before saying if the Council doesn’t address resident’s concerns when they are small, they will continue to escalate until the Council is forced to address them. She thinks this article proves her point. Ms. Ramundt stated you can rationalize this article any way you want, but she sees