My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0912
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0912
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 10:34:29 AM
Creation date
10/6/2016 9:31:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/12/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 12, 2016 <br />Page 22 <br /> <br />and have to rise to a certain level before draining into the sewer system. Those <br />two ponds have aeriation fountains to decrease algae accumulation and eliminate <br />mosquitos. <br /> <br />Mr. House stated when they build their home in 1976, there was more low area <br />and water and, in fact, they used to put pellets out in the spring to control mosqui- <br />tos. With regard to Basin 2, he noted it is not in the lowest area as the lowest area <br />is in the easement so he is not sure the role Basin 2 would play in solving the <br />overalls water storage capacity issue. <br /> <br />Mr. House stated he considers Brad Koland to be a good friend and personally <br />does not think they are trying to block development that’s consistent with the area <br />and doesn’t create additional problems provided the water problems are dealt <br />with. Mr. House pointed out the drainage is not Gluek Lane’s problem as this <br />neighborhood is absorbing some of the water running through the area. He stated <br />he is unsure where the Fairview Avenue storm sewer fills but water in the whole <br />area needs to be dealt with. <br /> <br />Steve McLoon, 1920 Gluek Lane <br />Mr. McLoon stated he is still opposed to this though appreciates the efforts that <br />have been made. He stated the Council has heard from the residents that there is <br />pretty unanimous opposition to this plan and while the landowner says he doesn’t <br />care what the neighbors think, he hopes the Council as their elected representa- <br />tives do care about what they think. <br /> <br />Mr. McLoon stated he has two concerns with the proposal. It was not clear to him <br />what will be done as compared to what could be done. It also was not clear to <br />him if the catch basins are going to be put into the deed and required. He stated in <br />the spring, the larger catch basin in the newly subdivided property is already up at <br />the water level so if you are just putting in a “swimming pool,” that’s not very <br />useful for catching more water. Mr. McLoon stated the water table in the spring- <br />time is a few inches under the ground, even without rain. He acknowledged the <br />catch basins were a nice idea but he does not think the larger one in that new <br />property will be useful. Mr. McLoon strongly encouraged the Council to again <br />deny this request. <br /> <br />John King, 1861 Gluek Lane <br /> <br />Mr. King stated the flooding on Gluek Lane is completely unrelated to the wet- <br />lands, which is lower than Gluek Lane because all the water that floods Gluek <br />Lane comes from above. Now the lot proposed to be subdivided is below Gluek <br />Lane so nothing he does is going to change the flooding as water goes downhill. <br /> <br />Mr. King stated everyone is saying it is terrible and something needs to be done <br />and he will suggest doing something. He stated he heard at an earlier Council <br />meeting that the wetland has a capacity of 1.3 to 1.6 million gallons. The geolog- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.