Laserfiche WebLink
In a recent Burnsville survey, Mr. Leaf noted the question was asked if a resident <br /> was a lake shore resident or not; and suggested such a filter could be used for <br /> Roseville as well, allowing their concerns to be sorted. <br /> Ms. Nestingen noted she had added "Speak Up! Roseville" as an engagement tool, <br /> and suggested that maybe could link to NextDoor.com. <br /> Mr. Culver agreed with that idea; but also noted the city's current registration isn't <br /> tremendous, and even though growing, he hoped discussions such as this might <br /> prompt more communitywide interest in that website. <br /> Member Wozniak suggested having a question whether people were willing to pay <br /> for improved water quality as a goal for sustainability, whether about the <br /> environment, life cycle or cost. <br /> Mr. Culver suggested there are parallel interpretations of sustainability, and <br /> financial sustainability affected if and how the stormwater system was maintained <br /> and whether or not the city was being environmentally sustainable for its impacts <br /> to the environment. <br /> Mr. Leaf referenced the goal statement section of that specific goal for that <br /> clarification. <br /> Mr. Culver noted the more water bodies drained will continue to impact the total <br /> maximum load (TML) limits; and requiring collaborative steps to address those <br /> pollutants, related efforts and projects to reduce those levels leaving the city. <br /> Member Wozniak noted his confusion with the MS4 items compared to the surface <br /> water management plan and how those two interacted. <br /> Mr. Leaf provided a quick snapshot of the MS4 program, a state regulatory program <br /> under the city's NDPES permit focused on water quality and what needs to happen <br /> for projects and operations within the city. While there is some overlap, Mr. Leaf <br /> clarified that this surface water management plan is part water quality, and part <br /> water quantity addressing flooding and other water resource-related issues beyond <br /> the simple water quality component. <br /> Member Thurnau noted that in order for him to identify things in the 2013 plan that <br /> needed to move forward or things he'd like to see altered of changed in the old plan, <br /> it would be helpful for him to see projects completed since 2013 to present; and <br /> asked that the information be upfront versus in the back of the plan. Member <br /> Thurnau opined this would allow f more linear look for him and the public in seeing <br /> goals and action plans going forward. Member Thurnau stated another issue he <br /> wanted to dig into further was groundwater and pulling down aquifers with lawn <br /> use and other water uses. Member Thurnau recognized the city's use of St. Paul <br /> Page 8 of 14 <br />