Laserfiche WebLink
property owners to replace laterals during a street replacement project. Mr. <br /> Sandstrom reviewed a similar program used in the City of Edina only during <br /> reconstruction, clarifying that the City of Roseville didn't follow that model for <br /> lateral replacements when only doing mill and overlay projects or anything <br /> involving pavement reclamation that kept the curb intact. Mr. Sandstrom noted that <br /> the City of Edina sent out letters to those affected by a project; and budgeted <br /> accordingly for upfront costs for the city as property owners were assessed and <br /> could pay over a 15-year term. <br /> Mr. Sandstrom reviewed programs in the City of West St. Paul and City of Golden <br /> Valley, both having an in-house camera system; and setting up appointments with <br /> residents connected within a project area. If those laterals are found non-compliant <br /> after inspection from inside the home, as per their respective ordinances, the <br /> property owner is required to fix it. <br /> As another example, Mr. Sandstrom noted the City of Eagan inspected their entire <br /> city within four years; and while that municipality is much larger than Roseville, <br /> noted their population had tripled and had many new laterals compared to <br /> Roseville's older system experiencing more issues with laterals constructed of <br /> different materials. <br /> Mr. Sandstrom noted the City of Shakopee's program had been highlighted by Mr. <br /> Pasko's presentation in February of 2016. <br /> Discussion included the number of street reconstruction projects anticipated by <br /> staff in the next five years, limited to 1-2 if determined not to be up to city standards <br /> due to construction and/or drainage issues, but most street now simply requiring <br /> mill and overlay and only patching or replacing curbs if cracked or settled. Mr. <br /> Culver clarified that only one street was not up to city standards at this time, as it <br /> was a recent turnback from Ramsey County (County Road B west of Cleveland <br /> Avenue connecting to Highway 280), but was an isolated neighborhood. Mr. <br /> Culver further noted some others that were in industrial areas where the curbs were <br /> not up to city standards. <br /> Chair Cihacek noted this resulted in fairly limited opportunities for the long-term <br /> consideration of lining projects during reconstruction other than those few sections <br /> mentioned by Mr. Culver. <br /> Mr. Culver noted there may be some unanticipated segments if a water main needed <br /> repair or replaced, or substantial repairs were needed to the sanitary sewer system <br /> where it couldn't be lined for some reason. In that case, Mr. Culver noted the road <br /> would be substantially compromised an opened up, creating cost advantages at that <br /> point to access services also. Mr. Culver noted there may be minimal situations <br /> where when performing a mill and overlay, no matter the depth, if unable to get <br /> good compaction in patching the street, it may be most cost effective to do service <br /> Page 8 of 17 <br />