My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-08-03_PC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-08-03_PC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2016 11:16:50 AM
Creation date
10/27/2016 11:16:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, August 3, 2016 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />Mr. Lloyd responded that depended on the City Council’s direction to staff on how <br />462 <br />to proceed. As a worst case scenario from his perspective, Mr. Lloyd noted that <br />463 <br />could be as part of the overall comprehensive plan update. While that may be the <br />464 <br />wrong level to consider regulations, Mr. Lloyd noted it may be a good opportunity <br />465 <br />to include that discussion as part of the community engagement process for the <br />466 <br />comprehensive plan update, allowing citizens to provide feedback on how they felt <br />467 <br />about temporary housing options or health care dwellings, that would <br />468 <br />subsequently inform the process in writing those regulations. With the early <br />469 <br />stages of the comprehensive plan update and community engagement process <br />470 <br />starting later this fall, Mr. Lloyd advised that the soonest staff could be prepared <br />471 <br />with draft language would be a minimum of two months. <br />472 <br />Chair Boguszewski suggested, if the timing for inviting public comment could be <br />473 <br />parallel to the comprehensive plan update process that would be fine. However, <br />474 <br />Chair Boguszewski questioned whether this may become lost within that larger <br />475 <br />discussion. Therefore, Chair Boguszewski suggested this topic run parallel to the <br />476 <br />comprehensive plan process, but not part of it. Chair Boguszewski suggested a <br />477 <br />task force advising this particular topic may be the most useful, such as the task <br />478 <br />force currently advising about the golf course and clubhouse. Chair Boguszewski <br />479 <br />noted this would provide a broader spectrum for the Planning Commission and <br />480 <br />City Council to receive that feedback. <br />481 <br />Member Murphy stated his preference to have this underway sooner than the <br />482 <br />comprehensive plan due date; opining the commission should be able to gather <br />483 <br />public comment and draft language for consideration and bring a recommendation <br />484 <br />forward before the twelve months allowed for the comprehensive plan update <br />485 <br />process. <br />486 <br />Chair Boguszewski closed the public hearing at 7:57 p.m.; no one spoke for or <br />487 <br />against. <br />488 <br />MOTION <br />489 <br />Member Murphy moved, seconded by Member Cunningham to recommend <br />490 <br />to the City Council APPROVAL of an amendment to City Code, Chapter <br />491 <br />1011.12 (Additional Standards for Specific Uses in All Districts), Item H <br />492 <br />(Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings) pursuant to authority granted by <br />493 <br />Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.3593, Subdivision 9, the City of Roseville <br />494 <br />opts-out of the requirements of Minnesota Statute, Chapter 362.3593, which <br />495 <br />defines and regulates Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings. <br />496 <br />Ayes: 7 <br />497 <br />Nays: 0 <br />498 <br />Motion carried <br />499 <br />6. Adjourn <br />500 <br />Member Kimble announced she would be unable to attend the September 14, 2016 <br />501 <br />Planning Commission meeting due to a scheduling conflict. <br />502 <br />Member Bull moved, seconded by Member Murphy adjournment of the meeting at <br />503 <br />approximately 7:58 p.m. <br />504 <br />Ayes: 7 <br />505 <br />Nays: 0 <br />506 <br />Motion carried <br />507 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.