Laserfiche WebLink
ЊЋЌ <br />ED <br />MPLOYMENTISTRICTS <br />The Planning Division also analyzed the minimum side- and rear-yard setback <br />ЊЋЍ <br />requirements in the Employment District, which includes Office/Business Park (O/BP) <br />ЊЋЎ <br />and Industrial (I) zoned properties and concluded that an existing minimum setback of <br />ЊЋЏ <br />40 feet for both side and rear yards is best suited to address potential impacts adjacent <br />ЊЋА <br />to residential uses. Planning Division staff is not recommending any text amendments <br />ЊЋБ <br />to the Office/Business Park or Industrial districts. <br />ЊЋВ <br />PC <br />ЊЌЉ <br />UBLICOMMENT <br />At the time this report was prepared, Planning Division staff has not received any <br />ЊЌЊ <br />communications from members of the public about the proposal. <br />ЊЌЋ <br />SPCA <br />ЊЌЌ <br />UGGESTEDLANNING OMMISSION CTION <br />Based on public comments and Planning Commissioner input, recommend approval of <br />ЊЌЍ <br />the amendments to Tables 1004-6, 1005-2, 1005-3, and 1005-4 of the Roseville Zoning <br />ЊЌЎ <br />Code as provided on Attachment E. <br />ЊЌЏ <br />AA <br />ЊЌА <br />LTERNATIVE CTIONS <br />a.Pass a motion to table the item for future action. <br />ЊЌБ <br />b.By motion, recommend denial of the proposal. <br />ЊЌВ <br />Report prepared by: Thomas Paschke, City Planner 651-792-7074 | thomas.paschke@cityofroseville.com <br />Attachments: A. CC minutes 05/23/16 B. CC minutes 07/25/16 <br /> C. CC minutes 08/15/16 D. Setback chart <br /> E. Proposed text amendments to various tables <br />PROJ0039_TextAmendments_100516 <br />Page 6 of 6 <br /> <br />