Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment A <br />Councilmember Laliberte moved, McGehee seconded, reconsideration of the motion to <br />ЌЊЌ <br />DENY the rezoning request as previously stated. <br />ЌЊЍ <br />Roll Call <br />ЌЊЎ <br />Ayes: <br />Willmus, Laliberte and McGehee. <br />ЌЊЏ <br />Nays: <br />Etten and Roe. <br />ЌЊА <br />Motion carried. <br />ЌЊБ <br />Roll Call (Original Willmus/McGehee Motion to DENY based on findings, now under <br />ЌЊВ <br />reconsideration): <br />ЌЋЉ <br />Ayes: <br />Willmus, Laliberte and McGehee. <br />ЌЋЊ <br />Nays: <br />Etten and Roe. <br />ЌЋЋ <br />Motion carried. <br />ЌЋЌ <br />City Attorney Gaughan advised that a resolution memorializing the findings for denial would <br />ЌЋЍ <br />be prepared and presented at the next meeting of the City Council. <br />ЌЋЎ <br />Interim Community Development Director Collins noted staff's sensitivities with HDR <br />ЌЋЏ <br />zoning; and advised that staff would look at those during the comprehensive plan update and <br />ЌЋА <br />how PUD fit with that. <br />ЌЋБ <br />Councilmember Willmus suggested a more immediate review by staff of the current PUD <br />ЌЋВ <br />ordinance. Councilmember Willmus noted the value of this type of project and community <br />ЌЌЉ <br />housing needs supported a text amendment, with components as suggested by <br />ЌЌЊ <br />Councilmember Etten, to the PUD ordinance. <br />ЌЌЋ <br />Without objection, staff was so directed. <br />ЌЌЌ <br />While admitting it may require a longer process, Councilmember Willmus opined the <br />ЌЌЍ <br />important thing was to ultimately get this right. <br />ЌЌЎ <br />Ms. Collins advised that, if the applicant was still interested, staff would walk them through <br />ЌЌЏ <br />the process. <br />ЌЌА <br /> <br />