Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, October 17, 2016 <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />gested more plain spoken language was important through introducing a commu- <br />nity voice. Ms. Lee stated that part of that more user-friendly language would <br />come from collecting first hand comments from the public that might make their <br />way into the actual plan document, making it their plan, not that of this firm’s <br />plan for Roseville. <br /> <br />Building on the getting started process and then further along the pathway, Mayor <br />Roe noted the City Council’s decision for an update versus starting over. As part <br />of that update, Mayor Roe noted the Imagine Roseville 2025 community vision- <br />ing process done in 2005, and asked the firm’s plan acknowledge, update and in- <br />corporate that rather large and not user-friendly document into the comprehensive <br />plan update. Mayor Roe asked how their team would determine if that vision was <br />still relevant today going into 2040 and how their process might engage with the <br />community to make that determination. <br /> <br />Mr. Dresdner sated that, prior to doing that, it would be necessary to develop a <br />community engagement plan as part of that analysis. Mr. Dresdner stated he <br />could imagine part of the response would be an understanding of who wasn’t part <br />of crafting that vision and then reaching out to that populations, whether online or <br />in person distribution. Mr. Dresdner suggested that could include a kick-off event <br />for the plan update as well as integrating the process into other events and activi- <br />ties the city already has going on versus having one full meeting. Mr. Dresdner <br />noted this could involve a post card distributed at different meetings already <br />scheduled. Mr. Dresdner opined that should be part of the community engage- <br />ment process already going on as part of earlier tasks and multi-channel efforts <br />involving online, print and in person strategies. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe noted that, along the way, his take away from the last plan update <br />process was that the process itself was disjointed with the public hearings at the <br />Planning Commission, then the City Council, with no real sense of the bigger pic- <br />ture and routine updates for each body, perhaps through checking off those mile- <br />stones throughout the process. <br /> <br />Mr. Dresdner noted the team had anticipated those check ins as noted in their pro- <br />posal, right now estimated at four during the process. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe opined the more, even if brief, the better.– along the way <br /> <br />With the Planning Commission serving as the statutory planning entity for the <br />City Council, Mayor Roe asked how the team anticipated incorporating them into <br />this process. <br /> <br />Ms. Lee responded that it would be accomplished through regular checks in of the <br />steering committee, consisting primarily of staff, and maybe incorporating mem- <br />bers of the Commission into that group making it an internal and semi-public <br /> <br />