CC_Minutes_2016_1010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, October 10, 2016 Page 40 While considering herself cheap and believing in accountability, Ms. Bakeman opined that the Roseville Police Department was well worth the money spent for it. City Council Position Statements Councilmember Willmus Councilmember Willmus noted several years ago when running for election, at a League of Women Voter's Forum, when specifically asked about going out to bid for police services, his response had been "no," and continued to be so now. While City Manager Trudgeon had already touched on several of his reasons for that response, Councilmember Willmus opined that ultimately it would become difficult for the City of Roseville to contain costs. With the seven cities currently contracting for Ramsey County Sheriff services, Councilmember Willmus noted they were each seeing a 6°/o increase in this budget cycle. In reviewing the comparison figures used in Councilmember McGehee's proposal versus current Roseville Police Department staffing levels, Councilmember Willmus opined that there were significant discrepancies, as also noted in Mr. Ko- land's public comments when reconciling those numbers with the Ramsey County proposal, especially from a FTE basis, opining that those discrepancies were stag- gering. When factoring in space and other intrinsic items, including information technology services, Councilmember Willmus opined that the city still came in with over $10,000 in FTE savings annually. When reconciling numbers for exist- ing levels of service and applying an apples to apples comparison, Councilmem- ber Willmus opined that the City of Roseville of Roseville was getting a pretty good deal. By not contracting out services, Councilmember Willmus noted there would be no loss of policing services; and furthermore noted the number of civilian employees beyond sworn officers in the department that factored into that level of service, but not taken into consideration, but all real jobs and real issues. Councilmember Willmus noted that many residents were troubled by this, and while perhaps not being as troubled by the proposal, he found that his concerns are caused because it didn't make fiscal sense nor provide any fiscal savings as presented and therefore, he didn't find the proposal supportable. Councilmember Willmus stated that the City Council was elected as a body to make judgments, one of most important being with the annual budget and tax levy, which he took seriously. Councilmember Willmus stated if the concern is with rising costs, he'd reach out to Councilmember McGehee suggesting she wark with her City Council colleagues to find realistic ways to reduce those costs. Councilmember Willmus noted that, over the last several budget cycles with those concerns in mind, they had been reflected in his vote to not support the budget.