My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_1024
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_1024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2016 10:34:54 AM
Creation date
11/14/2016 10:23:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/24/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, October 24, 2016 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />If that was the consensus of the body, Mayor Roe suggested tabling approval of <br />the October 10, 2106 meeting minutes to allow Councilmember McGehee to pre- <br />pare and submit additional text. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGehee stated she would be happy to do so, as long as she was <br />assured it wasn’t a waste of her time to do so, based on past experience, and in <br />lieu of no second to her motion tonight. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe clarified that the draft submitted by Councilmember McGehee would <br />be considered at the time of consideration of those minutes, and acted upon ac- <br />cordingly, similar to any other meeting minutes amendments for consideration. <br /> <br />Councilmember Etten stated he appreciated Councilmember McGehee’s point, <br />noting the robust amount of information provided in her presentation, and that it <br />was not included in detail in the meeting minutes. However, Councilmember Et- <br />ten noted it was typical and part of the normal process that not all information is <br />included, even when staff makes a presentation. Councilmember Etten stated he <br />would consider Councilmember McGehee providing some of the finer points she <br />felt were appropriate; however, he stated he would not be supportive of a full re- <br />write of the meeting minutes as currently presented. As had been discussed in the <br />past by the City Council, Councilmember Etten noted the intent of what was rec- <br />orded at a meeting by the Recording Secretary was a record of the discussion ver- <br />sus an exact duplication. Councilmember Etten stated he would consider an en- <br />hancement of what was currently in the meeting minutes taken by Councilmem- <br />ber McGehee from her presentation within the perspective of past discussions and <br />based on what was provide in the RCA and attachments and the meeting minutes <br />summary. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGehee concurred with Councilmember Etten, suggesting it <br />may be beneficial to supplement the RCA and attachments with a copy of Coun- <br />cilmember McGehee’s Power Point presentation if that was her desire. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe noted this was standard practice and would happen as usual. <br /> <br />Councilmember Willmus sought clarification that Councilmember McGehee’s <br />desire was to supplement the October 10, 2016 meeting minutes. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGehee stated that was her intent as she found nothing factual <br />in the meeting minutes as currently presented. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe reiterated that the meeting minutes were similar to others as usual, and <br />were not intended to record all details. However, if Councilmember McGehee <br />wished to add to pages 30-31 of the meeting draft minutes with a summary of her <br />information, the City Council could consider that when approving the October 10, <br />2016 meeting minutes. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.