My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016_1116_FC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Finance Commission
>
Packet
>
2016_1116_FC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2016 11:44:12 AM
Creation date
11/28/2016 11:43:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville Finance Commission <br />Agenda Item <br /> <br />Page 9 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />As the graph indicates, over the past eight years the average overall usage + captured volume of water <br />for single-family homes in the summertime ranged from 31,000 gallons per quarter to 39,000. <br /> <br />What is clearly evidenced by the data, summertime consumption patterns are directly influenced by <br />rainfall amounts. Clearly, customers reduced their summertime consumption during heavier rainfall <br />periods. Changes in water usage fees didn’t seem to be a factor on how much water was used. Once <br />again, it appears that customers are making a conscious decision to maintain an established standard – <br />in this case a healthy lawn and garden while remaining mindful of the tenets of water conservation. The <br />bottom line is that single-family summertime water consumption has dropped by 29% since 2009. <br /> <br />Rate Comparisons <br />The graphs below depict a number of water and sewer rate comparisons with other peer communities. <br />For this analysis, peer communities include 1st ring suburbs that serve a population between 18,000 and <br />50,000, and which are not simply an extension of a larger entity’s system (e.g. Maplewood is excluded <br />because they’re part of St. Paul’s system). This group was selected to try and approximate cities with <br />stand-alone systems with similar age of infrastructure which can have a significant influence on the cost <br />of water and sewer services. <br /> <br />It should be noted that broad comparisons only give a cursory look at how one community’s rates <br />compares to another. One must also incorporate each City’s individual philosophy in funding programs <br />and services. <br /> <br />For example, Roseville does NOT utilize assessments to pay for water or sewer infrastructure <br />replacements like many other cities do. Instead we fund infrastructure replacements 100% through the <br />rates. As a result, Roseville’s water and sewer rates are inherently higher when compared to a City that <br />uses assessments to pay for improvements. Other influences on the rates include whether or not a <br />community softens its water before sending it on to customers, and the extent in which communities <br />charge higher rates to non-residential customers. <br /> <br /> 5 <br /> 10 <br /> 15 <br /> 20 <br /> 25 <br /> 30 <br /> 35 <br /> 40 <br /> 45 <br />2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 <br />SF Homes: Avg Water Usage/Captured <br />April -September <br />Avg. Consumption (Gals.)Avg. Rainfall (Gals.)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.