My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016_1116_FC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Finance Commission
>
Packet
>
2016_1116_FC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2016 11:44:12 AM
Creation date
11/28/2016 11:43:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Finance Commission Minutes <br />October 11, 2016 – Draft Minutes <br />Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br />Commissioner Zeller moved, Seconded by Commissioner Hodder, to approve the September 13, 46 <br />2016 meeting minutes as amended. The motion carried unanimously. 47 <br /> 48 <br /> 49 <br />Continue Discussion on Cash Reserves 50 <br /> 51 <br />Commissioner Zeller reviewed the charts prepared for the General Fund Reserve, Parks and 52 <br />Recreation Reserve, Community Development Reserve, Information Technology Fund Reserve, 53 <br />License Center Reserve, Telecommunications Fund Reserve, and the Annual Operating 54 <br />Expenses and Reserve Balances versus Reserve Goals. These graphs were updated to include 55 <br />the 2016-2017 projected budget. 56 <br /> 57 <br />Chair Schroeder asked if the City Council included the Police Reserve Fund when they reviewed 58 <br />the budget. 59 <br /> 60 <br />Finance Director Miller stated the budget does not include the Police Forfeiture Fund. 61 <br /> 62 <br />Chair Schroder pointed out that the 2016 Budget is showing a short fall of $376,000 and this 63 <br />would reduce the General Fund Reserves. 64 <br /> 65 <br />Commissioner Bachhuber stated based on the General Fund Reserve graph the City would not be 66 <br />able to use reserves in 2017 because this would bring the balance below the target goal. 67 <br /> 68 <br />Commissioner Harold asked if the Commission should consider making a recommendation to the 69 <br />City Council regarding the General Fund Reserve for this budget cycle. When looking at the 70 <br />charts the City would be below the target goal in 2017 and the City should consider reducing the 71 <br />amount of reserves they are using in order to stay within the goal range. 72 <br /> 73 <br />Chair Schroeder stated the not to exceed tax levy has been set so the City would have to look at 74 <br />reducing expenditures in order to reduce the use of reserves. 75 <br /> 76 <br />Commissioner Zeller stated the City Council will need to decide what steps need to be taken to 77 <br />make sure the reserves remain in the target range. 78 <br /> 79 <br />Commissioner Bachhuber stated the City will need to think outside of the box for different 80 <br />elements of the budget to be able to manage these over time. The City would not want to be 81 <br />below the goal range when harder economic times occur. 82 <br /> 83 <br />Commissioner Harold asked what had caused the large increase in reserves in 2010. 84 <br /> 85 <br />Finance Director Miller stated there had been decertification of a TIF District and the capture of 86 <br />one-time funds for this. 87 <br /> 88 <br />Item 3: Attachment A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.