Res_11375 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Policy 9.2: Promote commercial development that is accessible by transit, automobile, walking, and bicycle. b. The proposed use is not in conflict with a Regulating Map or othe�^ adopted plan. The proposed addition of this use is not in conflict with the adopted Regulating Plan because the use does not require any site or building improvements that this plan governs. c. The proposed use is not in conflict with any City Code requirements. The proposed yoga studio/fitness center is not in conflict with any Code requirements as the building is pre- existing and the use would be a tenant within. All other items either comply with the City Code or the previously adopted Planned Unit Development. d. The proposed use will not be injurious to the sur�ounding neighborhood, will nol negatively impact t�affic or properry values, and will not otherwise harm the public health, safety, and general welfare. The addition of a yoga studio would increase current traffic and parking demand at this location, but such increases would not be impactful to current tenants, and the new use would add very little additional traffic to the adjacent road network. Similarly, the use has a very limited impact given the small class sized of between 8 and 16 students. And WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission recommended the following conditions be added to the CU approval for 1940-1944 Lexington Avenue: 1. Class size limited to no greater than 20 students 2. All yoga/fitness classes be conducted indoors And WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council has determined the same regarding the proposed yoga studio/fitness center as a CoND[T�oNAL UsE at 1940-1944 Lexington Avenue; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to APPROVE the proposed yoga studio/fitness center as a CoNDiT�oNAL UsE at 1940-1944 Lexington Avenue in accordance with Roseville City Code and subject to the following conditions: 1. Class size limited to no greater than 20 students 2. All yoga/fitness classes be conducted indoors The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member McGehee and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee and Roe; and none voted against. WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 2 of 3