My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
EDA_Minutes_2016_11_28
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
EDA_Minutes_2016_11_28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2017 11:33:46 AM
Creation date
1/6/2017 9:07:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REDA Meeting <br />Minutes — Monday, November 28, 2016 <br />Page 2 <br />President Roe noted at the institution of the REDA, action was taken in <br />accordance with the by-laws for designation as appropriate. <br />Member Etten sought further clarification for the Executive Director and <br />President in their roles; and noted changes in that clause that may be needed as <br />part of other changes being discussed tonight. Member Etten also questioned <br />if there was a distinction regarding what types of documents were being <br />referred to and whether or not signing and authorization could occur under or <br />over a particular monetary amount without further REDA approval. <br />Ms. Collins advised that Executive Director Trudgeon's and her consultation <br />with EDA Attorney Ingram, the original enabling resolution stipulated the <br />roles for the officers and the Authority itself. Ms. Collins noted that and was <br />also addressed in the draft resolution (Attachment A— lines 47 — 68). Ms. <br />Collins noted these were outlined in statutory requirements for an EDA. <br />President Roe referenced Article 3(The Officers) of the by-laws as referenced <br />in the staff report (page 1, italicized language), agreeing that Member Etten's <br />points were valid in that similar language on the top of page 3 appeared to be <br />contradictory regarding the Executive Director and President in signing <br />documents. President Roe asked that staff review the clauses to ensure their <br />consistency, including the language on the top of page 3 and Section II on page <br />1 as to signing of documents, deeds, or particular instruments. <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that, in her conversations with EDA Attorney Ingram, Ms. <br />Ingram recommended retaining standard EDA by-laws in keeping with <br />statutory requirements; and making any modifications via a resolution. Ms. <br />Kelsey noted one other document was the previously referenced enabling <br />resolution that essentially governs the REDA and was referred to in the by- <br />laws and would be deferred to. Ms. Kelsey reported that she had requested <br />Ms. Ingram to attend the December 5, 2016 REDA meeting to explain the <br />rationale in modifying certain sections of the by-laws at this time, as well as <br />for requesting an additional resolution for other pending amendments. <br />Given the number of concerns raised tonight, Executive Director Trudgeon <br />suggested tabling action tonight for a better understanding at the December 5, <br />2016 meeting. <br />President Roe reiterated Member Etten's question regarding language of the <br />resolution (lines 31 — 39) for expenditures over $50,000 versus the $5,000 limit <br />for the City Council. President Roe stated that he too wanted to understand the <br />justification for that, and whether the higher limit was related to land � <br />transactions. President Roe asked that EDA staff also clarify that distinction <br />on December Stn <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.