Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, December 5, 2016 <br />Page 35 <br />Councilmember Laliberte noted that the last time this issue was addressed she had <br />also expressed her support for an ordinance similar to this model that would en- <br />courage adoption models as used in other Roseville pet stores. Councilmember <br />Laliberte clarified that she wasn't looking to put anyone out of business, but stat- <br />ed everyone needed to adapt to the changing environment. As a lifelong dog <br />owner, Councilmember Laliberte noted that she had procured them in a number of <br />different ways, usually for a particular breed from a particular breeder. However, <br />Councilmember Laliberte noted that some of her family members had also used <br />the adoption route with success. Councilmember Laliberte stated that she wasn't <br />sure if she was comfortable with the draft model ordinance as presented, but was <br />open to input from the City Attorney regarding the criminal aspect of it and how <br />this model would move the city toward a humane model versus another approach. <br />Councilmember Laliberte suggested staff review pet ordinances of other cities, <br />consult with the City Attorney, and then bring something back to the City Council <br />that will work for Roseville. <br />In terms of an ordinance, Councilmember McGehee stated that she wasn't sure if <br />this model was the right one or not, particularly with a criminal or non-criminal <br />aspect if there wasn't an alternative way to accomplish the same thing. Coun- <br />cilmember McGehee stated she was not in favor of puppy mills, having housed <br />many rescue animals at her home, and in agreement with Ms. Kough about the <br />sparse visitations and inspections and inadequate housing of pets for sale. Coun- <br />cilmember McGehee opined that the model from the Wisconsin speaker provided <br />a more aggressive use of rescues and puppies and kittens available in-store most <br />of the time, but not housed there necessarily, but rotating the sites with volunteers <br />from rescue agencies. Noting Mr. Papineau's perspective, Councilmember <br />McGehee stated her interest in a solution for both sides. <br />Councilmember Etten stated his support for finding a way to not allow a supply of <br />dogs and cats from puppy mills, such as using a program like "Paws to Paws <br />Adoption." Councilmember Etten expressed his interest in the care of animals <br />proposed by Mr. Papineau with licenses and veterinary inspections; and noted the <br />draft model ordinance did not allow for multi-day housing for animals in consid- <br />eration of their health. <br />Mayor Roe concluded that the two basic concerns seemed to be sourcing of ani- <br />mals through puppy mills, and breeding operations not being up to par. While <br />that is something the city has to be concerned about, Mayor Roe noted the need to <br />also preserve another business model besides only that of adoption; questioning if <br />that needs to be preserved in Roseville. Citing the larger cities of Minneapolis <br />and St. Paul sure with greater capability for inspections, licensing and a regulatary <br />environment for that type of business model based on their larger staffs and areas <br />of expertise, Mayor Roe noted that if the city went to that model, it would in ef- <br />fect be eliminating any other business model in Roseville across the board. <br />Mayar Roe noted his interest in weighing a long-term business in the community <br />