My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_1205
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_1205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2017 3:53:18 PM
Creation date
1/12/2017 11:46:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/5/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, December 5, 2016 <br />Page 7 <br />Councilmember McGehee suggested that, if you used permeable pavers for a <br />driveway, you could then have a larger house. <br />While that might be conceptually true, Mr. Lloyd noted that one qualification <br />worth making in that regard was in assuming permeable paving was used to go <br />beyond the 35% impervious coverage restriction on a property. Also, Mr. Lloyd <br />noted that any paving system would have to be evaluated by the city's engineer- <br />ing staff to rate their effectiveness and what portion of the installation would ac- <br />tually be considered pervious; as well as short- and long-term maintenance and <br />ramifications should that maintenance fail at any time in the future. Therefore, <br />Mr. Lloyd advised that it wasn't just as simple as someone getting more develop- <br />ment based on installation of permeable pavers. <br />Mayor Roe noted that, even is using permeable pavers, a property owner still <br />couldn't exceed the total improvement area, or get more house if exceeding set- <br />back requirements. <br />While still unable to support the proposed 60', Councilmember Willmus advised <br />that he would consider 55%, opining that would still accomplish the intended. <br />Since the initial improvement area had been 50%, Mr. Lloyd agreed that 55% <br />would achieve some improvement. <br />Willmus moved, Etten seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1515 (Attachment <br />B) entitled, "An Ordinance Amending Improvement Area Regulations of Chapter <br />1004 (Residential Districts of Title 10 (Zoning Code) of Roseville City Code;" <br />amende�l to a SS% improvement area for LDR-2 parcels. <br />In a related note, Councilmember McGehee expressed her ongoing interest in <br />moving away from stormwater ponds and raingardens to avoid difficulties for <br />staff to monitor them and ensure their viability, thus her suggestion that some of <br />the improvement area make an attempt to utilize permeable surfaces. <br />Councilmember Willmus stated his interest in entertaining that discussion at a lat- <br />er date, but not specifically tied to this issue. <br />Mayar Roe agreed, suggesting it be considered in a broader application for other <br />districts as well. Mayor Roe further noted his concern in including such a provi- <br />sion in this requested action, without due public process and feedback from the <br />Planning Commission. <br />City Manager Trudgeon duly noted the additional discussion as part of a future <br />agenda. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Willmus, Etten, McGehee, Laliberte and Roe. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.