Laserfiche WebLink
9c. Attachment A <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 28, 2016 <br />Page 23 <br />quisitions that didn’t move forward. Councilmember McGehee suggested the city <br />not be so tied into an appraisal early in the process until deciding how serious it <br />was. <br />Councilmember Etten stated he was comfortable with the current language, noting <br />it was inherent for this city council to approve the whole process, therefore mak- <br />ing no further changes in language necessary. <br />Mayor Roe agreed, opining any future city council was able to changeor eliminate <br />the policy. <br />Mayor Roe summarized the changes made tonight, including: <br />Section 3, Items 3 and 4 moving in order of importance <br />Regarding “estimated market value and tax collections” to express that intent <br />somewhat better remove “and tax collections” entirely. <br />Mayor Roe noted that when increasing the tax base as the result of redevel- <br />opment it would be helpful to look at the project with and without the incre- <br />ment figured in to see the net cost to the city if using TIF financing. <br />In the benefits section, Mayor Roe, with input from Councilmember McGehee, <br />suggested consideration of a net change to the city tax base with or without the <br />increment and impact on the average taxpayer. Mayor Roe opined this was food <br />for thought for staff and the consultant, clarifying that the intent to promote an <br />idea for this or future councils that the city received more dollars by allowing re- <br />development. <br />On the acquisition form, Councilmember Laliberte suggested for the “estimated <br />timeline” instead adding “date available for market.” <br />On the form, Mayor Roe also noted that under “property information,” not all <br />properties had an asking price and suggested adding a component, “is the property <br />on or not on the market?” <br />When talking about tax capacity, Mr. Aarsvold noted one measure of growth was <br />the tax base, which could be calculated. However, Mr. Aarsvold noted it may <br />prove neutral with respect to whether it creates a tax break or not; and wouldn’t <br />be as clear to the general public. To be accurate, Mr. Aarsvold noted the reason <br />for looking at tax capacity. <br />With the next revised draft from Mr. Aarsvold, Ms. Collins advised that both the <br />City Council and REDA would need to approve the framework; and anticipated <br />the January organizational meetings may be a good time to do so. <br />Mayor Roe thanked Mr. Aarsvold and city staff for their ongoing work on this <br />policy. <br /> <br />