Laserfiche WebLink
Stormwater Base Rate Cateeory <br />_Single -Family Residential & Duplex <br />_Multi -Family & Churches <br />Cemeteries & Golf Course <br />Parks <br />Schools & Community Centers <br />Commercial & Industrial <br />2016 2017 <br />Rate Rate Comm <br />$ 12.35 $ 12.95 MStandard SF rate <br />9.30 9.75 1 IStandard SF rate x 0.75 <br />28.75 <br />30.20 <br />Standard SF rate x 2.35 <br />46.45 <br />48.80 <br />1 <br />Standard SF rate x 3.75 <br />191.00 <br />200.55 <br />Standard SF rate x 15.50 <br />106 Water Usage History <br />107 The series of graphs presented below depict water customer consumption patterns over the past 8 years <br />108 beginning with a depiction of the citywide water consumption. <br />109 <br />1,800,000 <br />1,600,000 <br />1,400,000 <br />1,200,000 <br />1,000,000 <br />800,000 <br />600,000 <br />400,000 <br />200,000 <br />110 <br />Citywide Water Usage (000's gals.) <br />2007 2008 2009 2010 <br />2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 <br />111 <br />112 As indicated in the graph, citywide consumption has generally been falling over the past eight years — a <br />113 17% reduction since 2007. With aggregate data it's difficult to conclude whether water customers are <br />114 truly modifying their behavior or if the volume is decreasing for other reasons such as the loss of high - <br />115 water users (manufacturing, hotels, apartments, etc.) or higher summertime rainfall totals. <br />116 <br />117 As we'll discuss further below, the average monthly summertime rainfall totals have increased somewhat <br />118 since 2009, however during this same period the City has seen growth in housing units, retail <br />119 establishments, and other commercial uses. The bottom line is that overall consumption has declined, <br />120 while the City has grown. <br />121 <br />122 <br />Page 6 of 11 <br />Rates for si <br />e -family are per housing unit; all others are per acre <br />W <br />2016 <br />2017 <br />Recvclime Rate Cateaory Rate <br />Rate <br />Comments <br />Single -Family <br />$ 5.60 <br />$ 6.50 <br />Standard rate <br />104 Multi -Family <br />_ 5.60 <br />6.50 <br />Standard rate <br />105 <br />106 Water Usage History <br />107 The series of graphs presented below depict water customer consumption patterns over the past 8 years <br />108 beginning with a depiction of the citywide water consumption. <br />109 <br />1,800,000 <br />1,600,000 <br />1,400,000 <br />1,200,000 <br />1,000,000 <br />800,000 <br />600,000 <br />400,000 <br />200,000 <br />110 <br />Citywide Water Usage (000's gals.) <br />2007 2008 2009 2010 <br />2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 <br />111 <br />112 As indicated in the graph, citywide consumption has generally been falling over the past eight years — a <br />113 17% reduction since 2007. With aggregate data it's difficult to conclude whether water customers are <br />114 truly modifying their behavior or if the volume is decreasing for other reasons such as the loss of high - <br />115 water users (manufacturing, hotels, apartments, etc.) or higher summertime rainfall totals. <br />116 <br />117 As we'll discuss further below, the average monthly summertime rainfall totals have increased somewhat <br />118 since 2009, however during this same period the City has seen growth in housing units, retail <br />119 establishments, and other commercial uses. The bottom line is that overall consumption has declined, <br />120 while the City has grown. <br />121 <br />122 <br />Page 6 of 11 <br />