My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-11-29_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-11-29_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2017 12:09:51 PM
Creation date
1/25/2017 12:08:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/29/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
581 <br />Member Seigler noted #3 and 4 as well and the need to link them to city code or <br />582 <br />ordinance. <br />583 <br />584 <br />Mr. Freihammer and Ms. Nestingen duly noted that suggestion for a direct <br />585 <br />reference as applicable; even though most ordinances were included in the appendix <br />586 <br />to the plan. <br />587 <br />588 <br />If not already addressed, Chair Cihacek suggested the addition of Strategy #6 to <br />589 <br />enforce it as a mechanism for increased code enforcement as it related to wetlands <br />590 <br />and any new structures in those areas. <br />591 <br />592 <br />Mr. Freihammer noted old things were grandfathered in, but the goal could ensure <br />593 <br />that new changes were adequately captured and addressed. <br />594 <br />595 <br />Chair Cihacek opined that many problems result from those properties <br />596 <br />grandfathered in; and suggested that they be identified and specifically located; and <br />597 <br />if a uniform ordinance addressed everything or various ordinances here and in other <br />598 <br />areas, or if it consisted of a series of regulations, and how that was addressed. Chair <br />599 <br />Cihacek further opined that the current inventory and categories, especially those <br />600 <br />grandfathered properties, needed to be re-evaluated to ensure uniform enforcement. <br />601 <br />602 <br />At the request of the PWETC, Ms. Nestingen advised that the plan update would <br />603 <br />include an acronym section to make it more user-friendly. <br />604 <br />605 <br />Goal 3 — Groundwater Protection <br />606 <br />At the request of Member Heimerl, Mr. Johnson addressed groundwater elevation <br />607 <br />versus the quality of groundwater in aquifers and wellhead protection areas; a few <br />608 <br />remaining abandoned wells in NE Roseville and needing monitoring and wellhead <br />609 <br />protection consideration, especially those not yet capped. <br />610 <br />611 <br />If only those two specific situations are being monitored, Chair Cihacek asked how <br />612 <br />Item #1 in this goal is even relevant. <br />613 <br />614 <br />Ms. Nestingen responded that the reference in #1 was intended to determine <br />615 <br />infiltration practices and which BMP's would be appropriate in a certain areas. Ms. <br />616 <br />Nestingen advised that cities generally regulate to avoid infiltration practices in <br />617 <br />wellhead protection areas if considered vulnerable, or there was a potential for <br />618 <br />contaminating source water for drinking wells. However, Ms. Nestingen noted this <br />619 <br />wasn't applicable to the majority of Roseville. <br />620 <br />621 <br />Chair Cihacek sought clarification as to whether it needed to be addressed as a <br />622 <br />bullet point or elsewhere since it wasn't applicable to most of Roseville. <br />623 <br />624 <br />Given the wellhead protection area, Member Wozniak opined it should remain. <br />625 <br />Page 14 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.