My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-11-29_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-11-29_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2017 12:09:51 PM
Creation date
1/25/2017 12:08:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/29/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Because of the increasing societal focus on causes of, and solutions to, climate change, it has <br />become imperative to measure waste reduction (and all of our activities) in terms ofits impact on <br />the environment. This allows us to speak in a common language, understand the impact of our <br />choices, and help us prioritize the personal, and policy actions that we take. Many cities around <br />the county work with the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) to <br />quantify and now register the climate change impacts of their city. It is also important to calculate <br />the carbon impact ofwaste reduction as the global effort continues to enact a carbon "cap and <br />trade" system. <br />In addition to climate change mitigation, there are other environmental benefits to recycling, <br />including saving energy and protecting air quality, water quality, natural resources, natural beauty, <br />habitat, and human health. <br />The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) WARM Calculator <br />The equations used in environmental calculations try to take into account the "full life cycle" of <br />each material—everything from off -setting the demand for more virgin materials (tree harvesting, <br />tinning, etc.) to preventing the pollution that would have occurred if that material were disposed <br />of (burned or buried). Different calculators may include some or all of the many factors that <br />contribute to the "full life cycle" so results will vary from calculator to calculator. <br />While there are many models emerging to calculate greenhouse gas reductions, the most <br />recognized, and standard model is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Waste Reduction <br />Model (WARM). WARM was designed to help solid waste planners, and organizations track, <br />and voluntarily report greenhouse gas emissions reductions from several different waste <br />management practices. WARM, last updated in June 2014, recognizes 46 material types. <br />WARM Model Analysis of Impact on Climate <br />Change <br />10,000 <br />8,000 <br />6,000 <br />4,000 <br />2,000 <br />2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 <br />■ Metric Tons of Carbon <br />■ Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide <br />MTCE (Metric tons of carbon equivalent), and MTCO.,E (Metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions) are figures connnonly used when <br />discussing greenhouse gas emissions. For more information about the process of measuring the environmental benefits ofwaste reduction, <br />visit trttro://ena.�ov/cluaLatechanEc/wycd/waste/utcasurceh�.htuil#click <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.