Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Freihammer noted there was always the potential that this could change, if an <br /> adjacent community changed its area and drilled a well, it could potentially affect <br /> a larger area. <br /> At the request of Member Wozniak, Mr. Freihammer reported the city was aware <br /> of twenty residences still hooked to private wells or private wells still in use and <br /> not connected to city water. Member Wozniak also asked if by the city tracking <br /> that data, if it played into this goal at all. <br /> Mr. Johnson advised that the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) and other <br /> agencies had data on abandoned wells on properties; and if they were still open and <br /> active (e.g. not sealed) and their direct connection to the aquifer. Acknowledging <br /> that there were twenty known active wells yet in Roseville, Mr. Johnson noted there <br /> may be hundreds across the city that had been abandoned but not sealed. <br /> At the request of Member Wozniak, Mr. Johnson advised that the data could be <br /> researched through the MDH and Soil & Water district. Member Wozniak opined <br /> the city should quantify active and inactive/not sealed wells to protect the <br /> groundwater as a resource. As an example,Member Wozniak referenced a property <br /> across the street from the City Hall campus currently under discussion as a potential <br /> development expansion that may be one of those sites needing a well abandoned. <br /> This suggestion was duly by Mr. Johnson. <br /> Goal 4 —Public Education and Outreach <br /> Chair Cihacek noted the need to remember to have hard copies available for <br /> residents for their access to education and public outreach, not just online options <br /> (e.g. stormwater pollution prevention plan). <br /> In Item 44, the PWETC asked that all public comment be sought, including from <br /> the City Council and across city advisory commissions. <br /> Member Wozniak suggested the education and outreach include "information <br /> boards" such as at the aerator on Bennett Lake to explain to the public what was <br /> happening and why, and tie it into the city's overall stormwater management plan; <br /> providing opportunities to increase the involvement of the public in the overall <br /> picture. <br /> Chair Cihacek noted Item 47, modeling interpretative sites; with Member Lenz <br /> suggesting such an interpretative site could be the boardwalk at the Harriet <br /> Alexander Nature Center (HANG) to educate people on the value of having <br /> swamps. <br /> At the request of Chair Cihacek, Mr. Freihammer clarified the intent in using the <br /> term "city," to mean the city as a whole, the City Council and staff inclusive. <br /> Page 15 of 20 <br />