My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-10-25_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-10-25_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2017 12:23:39 PM
Creation date
1/25/2017 12:23:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/25/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Heimerl asked if the latest guide for the Metropolitan Council provided <br /> any updates relevant to this plan update. <br /> Mr. Johnson advised that several guides were referenced specific to stormwater <br /> issues; with Mr. Freihammer suggesting the plan update reference the "latest <br /> version" rather than specifically dated updates or guides, allowing the plan to be <br /> updated by reference as applicable. <br /> Member Wozniak noted the desire to install remote readers on city facility water <br /> meters, with Mr. Freihammer suggesting this goal would be the area to do that to <br /> address the city monitoring its water usage. <br /> Other Goals <br /> Ms. Nestingen sought additional feedback from the PWETC on other potential <br /> goals not addressed in these seven. Ms. Nestingen noted that sustainability was the <br /> hot button topic with the last update process; while now it was "resiliency and <br /> planning for future climate change." <br /> Member Wozniak noted he was also thinking about that and public health circles <br /> and changes coming about as a result; and suggested addressing those or being <br /> prepared for them as this plan moves forward. While it related somewhat to <br /> sustainability, Member Wozniak questioned if it warranted its own separate goal. <br /> Chair Cihacek opined that it already existed in each of these seven goals, and was <br /> made clearer in Goal 3. Therefore, Chair Cihacek suggested that those elements <br /> either be pulled out of the previous seven goals and made a separate goal, or <br /> referenced as part of each goal already addressed. However, Chair Cihacek noted <br /> the missing piece was how resiliency analysis or planning was Roseville specific. <br /> As a next step for staff, Chair Cihacek suggested pinpointing specific steps in the <br /> existing plan based on those trends, or state if they're already covered in goals and <br /> gauge them accordingly. <br /> At the request of Member Wozniak, Ms. Nestingen noted rainfall estimates, based <br /> on the 2014 publication, while not addressing specific goals but alluding to them, <br /> had resulted in design standards being updated accordingly. <br /> Member Wozniak opined he would like to know more about resiliency discussions <br /> that had been put forth and climate change items to add as a separate goal or <br /> specifically referenced in the sustainability goal at a minimum. <br /> Current and Potential Issues <br /> Ms. Nestingen noted broad issues in the current 2013 Plan Issues Assessment. <br /> Mr. Freihammer noted city staff would also provide updated issues from their <br /> perspective: some old or ongoing from the previous plan, and some new for this <br /> plan. <br /> Page 17 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.