My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-02-01_PC_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2017 Agendas
>
2017-02-01_PC_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2017 8:39:12 AM
Creation date
2/7/2017 8:39:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
wĻŭǒƌğƩtƌğƓƓźƓŭ/ƚƒƒźƭƭźƚƓaĻĻƷźƓŭ <br />aźƓǒƷĻƭΑĻķƓĻƭķğǤͲWğƓǒğƩǤЍͲЋЉЊА <br />tğŭĻЊЍ <br />of that quality of life. Ms. Skavar also encouraged the commission to look at the concept of traffic <br />653 <br />calming devices (e.g., boulevards with trees, circles) and other ways to encourage traffic to slow <br />654 <br />down, not only in neighborhoods but in commercial areas as well. Ms. Skavar opined that the <br />655 <br />next generation may choose sidewalks versus cars; and with the walking trailways throughout <br />656 <br />Roseville serving to connect neighborhoods, it had a good start, but needed more of those <br />657 <br />connections by piggybacking onto other projects or ways to create that livable community for the <br />658 <br />next generation rather than simply resigning itself to be a community with an aging demographic, <br />659 <br />but instead worthy of the next generation. <br />660 <br />Member Bull agreed with those comments and the need to look at that future urbanization to <br />661 <br />suburbanization aspect and where Roseville was in that 20 year range and then look at <br />662 <br />technology and other changes to consider for the next group of residents. <br />663 <br />With no one else appearing, at approximately 9:13 p.m., Chair Boguszewski closed public <br />664 <br />comment. <br />665 <br />b. Review dates for monthly meetings dedicated to the comprehensive plan update. A <br />666 <br />regular, fourth-Wednesday monthly meeting has been proposed; for discussion, those <br />667 <br />dates in 2017 are as follows: <br />668 <br />January 25 May 24 September 27 <br />669 <br />February 22 June 28 October 25 <br />670 <br />March 22 July 26 November 22 <br />671 <br />April 26 August 23 December 26 <br />672 <br />Discussion ensued on available of the Council Chambers for these additional meetings; start <br />673 <br />times; length of meetings anticipated at 1.5 to 2 hours; and specific agendas and advance <br />674 <br />homework for the commission for these additional monthly meetings focusing on the <br />675 <br />comprehensive plan update. <br />676 <br />MOTION <br />677 <br />Member Bull moved, seconded by Member Daire to approve the additional special meeting <br />678 <br />dates in January through October, as discussed, specific to the comprehensive plan <br />679 <br />update process as follows; amended from staff’s proposal to consider November and <br />680 <br />December dates to be determined at a later date if and as needed <br />681 <br />Ayes: 5 <br />682 <br />Nays: 0 <br />683 <br />Motion carried. <br />684 <br />6. Adjourn <br />685 <br />MOTION <br />686 <br />By consensus, Chair Boguszewski adjourned the meeting at approximately 9:19 p.m. <br />687 <br />Ayes: 5 <br />688 <br />Nays: 0 <br />689 <br />Motion carried. <br />690 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.