My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-01-24_PWETCPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2017
>
2017-01-24_PWETCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2017 3:20:25 PM
Creation date
2/28/2017 3:15:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/24/2017
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
addition, the City should provide improved bicycle and <br />pedestrian facilities between residential areas,work sites, <br />and transit facilities, and should put in place land -use <br />controls that encourage development that is transit- and <br />pedestrian -friendly <br />In Roseville, the local sensitivities to expanding roads <br />are reflected in the goals expressed in the Imagine <br />Roseville 2025 report as well as this plan. Therefore the <br />City should support travel demand management such <br />as the HOV lane on TH 36. <br />Non -Motorized Transportation <br />Roseville updates the pathway master plan on a regular <br />basis. The plan recognizes the following principles: <br />Different types of facilities are appealing to <br />different users, particularly when considering the <br />individual experience levels. The Roseville pathway <br />plan should address the needs of all users. <br />Pathways are needed along all minor arterials and <br />collectors, since they usually provide the most direct <br />route for travelers. <br />• All development and redevelopment proposals <br />should be reviewed for pathway connections or <br />reservation of future pathway links. <br />• To provide the greatest benefit, Roseville's pathways <br />should connect with neighboring communities and <br />the regional system. <br />Regular maintenance to non -motorized pathways <br />is critical to ensuring their usefulness and <br />attractiveness. Roseville should continue to support <br />the pathway -management program that programs <br />pathway rehabilitation and reconstruction. <br />5-42 I Transportation Adopted: October 26, 2009 City of Roseville <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.