Laserfiche WebLink
intensity to encourage transit use and reduce <br />automobile congestion are often competing <br />objectives. For this mason, coordination ofland-use <br />and transportation planning is critical. <br />2. Transportation Choices and Roadway Needs: <br />Reduce traditional, single -occupancy motorized <br />travel through Transportation Demand <br />Management (TDM), increased non -motorized <br />travel, and transit.This approach has two benefits. <br />Fast, it limits the consumption of fuel by single - <br />occupant vehicles and associated air emissions. <br />Second, it can reduce the demand for added <br />roadway capacity,allowing roadway "foo Pon ins"and <br />impacts to be minimized. TDM, non -motorized <br />transportation, and transit considerations will be <br />discussed ingreater detail in this chapter Encourage <br />telecommuting through the development of <br />technology infrastructure <br />3. Appropriate Roadway Design: Plan and design <br />roadways using best professional practices, including <br />functional classification, sound transportation <br />and engineering practices, access management <br />guidelines, and other proven tools to provide <br />transportation facilities that have good operational <br />and safety characteristics. <br />4. Sustainable Practices: Employ reuse/recycling, <br />procurement measures, and facility maintenance <br />practices pertaining to transportation that limit <br />the use of resources. This includes reuse/recycling <br />of roadway materials as part of reconstruction <br />projects, evaluation of alternative fuel vehicles for <br />City fleets, and other measures <br />Pq <br />Transportation Pian <br />Oty of Roseville <br />Existing Transportation Conditions <br />Roadway Overview <br />Roseville is depicted in Figure 5.1 (Regional Location <br />Map). It is located within the I-694 beltway. Important <br />regional roadways that pass through or adjacent to the <br />city include I -35W, TH 280, TH 36, and Snelling <br />Avenue N. Figure 5.2 (Existing (2006) Daily Traffic <br />Volumes) displays the current roadway system and the <br />2006 daily traffic volumes. Figure 5.3 (Existing (2008) <br />Number ofLanes) displays the number oflanes on each <br />roadway segment <br />Jurisdictional Classification <br />Jurisdiction over the roadway system in Roseville is <br />shared among three levels of government the State <br />of Minnesota, Ramsey County, and Roseville The <br />Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) <br />maintains the interstate and trunk highway systems <br />Ramsey County maintains the County State Aid <br />Highway (CSAH) and County Road Systems, aside <br />from a few, short private streets. The remaining streets <br />and roadways are the responsibility of Roseville, <br />including Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets. Over <br />19e%of the land area in the city is used for right of way. <br />Since the municipal boundaries separating Roseville <br />from adjacent cities often lie within a roadway right- <br />of-way, partnership with adjacent cities is required to <br />coordinate maintenance of these roadways. Figure 5.4 <br />(Roadway Jurisdictional Classification) displays the <br />jurisdictional classification of each roadway within <br />Roseville Table 5.1 displays the number of roadway <br />miles associated with each jurisdictional class. <br />Jurisdictional <br />Classification <br />State of Minnesota <br />Miles <br />10.6 <br />Parcen t of <br />Total Miles <br />6.2% <br />Ramsey County <br />37.9 <br />221% <br />City of Roseville dASA) <br />28.9 <br />16.8% <br />City of Roseville <br />94.4 <br />54.9% <br />TOTAL <br />171.8 <br />100.0% <br />Source CiR of Roseville Metropolitan counai,wsB &Associates, inc <br />Existing (2008) Roadway Miles by Jurisdictional <br />Classification <br />Table 5.1 <br />5-4 1 Transportation Adopted: October 26, 2009 City of Roseville <br />