My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-01-24_PWETCPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2017
>
2017-01-24_PWETCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2017 3:20:25 PM
Creation date
2/28/2017 3:15:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/24/2017
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
miles traveled on each minor arterial roadway segment. <br />A crash occurring within an intersection is included <br />in the crash rate calculations for each of the roadway <br />segments leading into the intersection. Intersection - <br />based crash rates are displayed as the number of crashes <br />per million vehicles entering the intersection. Table 5.15 <br />lists the average crash rates calculated by MnDOT for <br />each roadway type within the Metro District. <br />The following general observations can be made from <br />this information: <br />The largest numbers of crashes are occurring along <br />I -35W and TH 36. Freeways are typically frequent <br />crash locations. This is not surprising, given the high <br />traffic volumes through these areas and the merge/ <br />weave maneuvers required. <br />The highest three intersection crash rates are at the <br />intersections of Rice Street and Larpenteur Avenue, <br />Rice Street and County Road B, and County Road <br />B and Snelling Avenue. The interchange of Fairview <br />Avenue N with TH 36 has also experienced a large <br />number of crashes. <br />The roadway segments with the highest crash rates <br />are County Road B between TH 280 and Cleveland <br />Avenue and County Road B between Fairview <br />Avenue and Hamline Avenue. <br />The MnDOT crash data files are such that individual <br />intersections, areas, or corridors can be analyzed in <br />detail. For each given study area, crashes can be sorted/ <br />analyzed in terms of severity of accident and other <br />factors. For severity, the categories range from fatality <br />to property (vehicle) damage only. The primary types <br />of intersection conditions and/or deficiencies will lead <br />to different patterns of crash types. <br />Non -Motorized Transportation <br />Non -motorized transportation facilities are considered <br />a vital part of the City's transportation system. For the <br />purposes of this Transportation Plan, non -motorized <br />transportation is defined as walking, jogging, and <br />cycling. While special consideration should be given <br />to the accommodation of those who wish to use a <br />different form of non -motorized transportation, it is <br />believed that walking,jogging, and cycling are the most <br />dominant modes. <br />The City's non -motorized transportation network <br />consists of nearly 102.57 miles of on- and off-road <br />pathways. Pathways are broken into the following types: <br />foot paths, sidewalks, trails, and striped shoulder. To <br />see the locations of these pathways, see Figure 5.9. The <br />system has been designed and coordinated to provide <br />connections with neighboring cities and regional <br />corridors. <br />The non -motorized transportation network serves a <br />variety of purposes and users, including recreational, <br />commuter, and shopping trips. The network <br />simultaneously serves walkers, joggers, cyclists, and <br />persons with disabilities. Commuting bicyclists can play <br />an important role in helping to reduce congestion during <br />several months of the year. In addition, many of the users <br />of the pathway system may be young children for whom <br />additional safety measures may be desired. To ensure the <br />highest level of efficiency and safety in the network, it <br />is critical to consider the needs of all users. <br />The need is for a congruent system that links the existing <br />non -motorized facilities with each other, creating a grid <br />not unlike the street network. The goal is to provide a <br />safe alternative to the automobile that can provide access <br />as conveniently and efficiently as that allowed for the <br />automobile. Every street within the city should have <br />a facility that provides safe travel for light traffic, i.e. <br />pedestrians, cyclists and in-line skaters, whether it's a <br />shared on -road facility or separated off-road facility. <br />The City's pathways can be classified into various <br />functional categories based on their design and intended <br />purpose. However, the classification system is not as <br />rigid as the system applied to roadways. <br />Roseville has 75.35 miles of off-road pathways. These <br />pathways are broken into three types: footpath, sidewalk, <br />and trail. There are 6.42 miles of footpaths within city <br />parks. These are constructed of woodchips, aggregate, <br />and boardwalks. They meander through natural areas <br />and are well suited for recreational use. <br />Roseville also has 36.4 miles of sidewalks, most ofwhich <br />are adjacent to roadways and within commercial areas. <br />These are likely to be utilized primarily by those walking <br />or by inexperienced cyclists. Nearly every walking or <br />jogging trip whether recreational, utilitarian, or both, <br />is likely to rely on sidewalks for a portion of the trip. <br />In addition to recreational use by walkers and joggers, <br />these facilities are likely to be used to access specific <br />destinations for work or shopping purposes. They are not <br />likely, however, to be attractive routes for experienced <br />cyclists who may prefer more direct routes, smooth <br />riding surfaces, or the ability to travel faster than is <br />reasonably safe on sidewalks. <br />Roseville also has 32.5 miles of off-street trails that may <br />be attractive routes for cyclists in addition to walkers <br />andjoggers. Some trails are better suited to recreational <br />cyclists while others are attractive facilities for bicycle <br />commuters or other utilitarian bicycle trips. These <br />2030 Comprehensive Plan Adopted: October 26, 2009 Transportation I 5-19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.