Laserfiche WebLink
366 <br />367 <br />368 <br />369 <br />370 <br />371 <br />372 <br />373 <br />374 <br />375 <br />376 <br />377 <br />378 <br />379 <br />380 <br />381 <br />382 <br />383 <br />384 <br />385 <br />386 <br />387 <br />388 <br />389 <br />390 <br />391 <br />392 <br />393 <br />394 <br />395 <br />396 <br />397 <br />398 <br />399 <br />400 <br />401 <br />402 <br />403 <br />404 <br />405 <br />406 <br />407 <br />408 <br />409 <br />410 <br />411 <br />7. <br />Roseville PWET Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Page 9, January 24, 2017 <br />Mr. Culver concurred, advising that the PWETC would be the body for holding <br />those public hearings for both plans in the future, with the RFP as presented <br />indicating three meetings with the PWETC: one focused on the Pathway MP, and <br />how the PWETC envisioned their involvement as part of their overall workload <br />over the upcoming year and available meetings. <br />At the request of Chair Cihacek, Mr. Culver reviewed the public hearing process, <br />similar to that held for the annual MS4 hearings by the PWETC; and part of the <br />normal business meeting of the PWETC. <br />Motion <br />Member Wozniak moved, Member Heimerl sec <br />City Council approval and formal release of <br />presented to update the current Transport t <br />Pathway Master Plan. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Stormwater Management <br />Environmental Specialist <br />subsequent presentation to <br />Surface Water Mana emen <br />evaluatingZ <br />to <br />as detailee st e <br />standards ted. s f <br />larger issu <br />based on the <br />district rules® <br />recommending to the <br />West for Proposals as <br />uding the existing <br />providedWrief introduction and <br />also e city's Comprehensive <br />pliance and consistency in <br />elVopent <br />projects throughout the city, <br />d attachments. As language in the <br />feedback regarding how parking lot <br />c to goals, policies and options. <br />ter management standards, Chair Cihacek noted <br />,gate base" materials and surfaces beyond that <br />is that this CSWMP did not include a definition section, but <br />0 onents as written in city policy. Mr. Johnson noted that the <br />w and when projects impact the base and/or sub -base materials <br />care footage of disturbed area, with the city and area watershed <br />requirements for "land disturbance" not always consistent. <br />Mr. Freihammer advised that it was intentional to not to define "reclaim, mill and <br />overlay, complete resurfacing, or reconstruction, but to leave as "aggregate base" <br />in a broader sense to allow flexibility in future clarification and direction. <br />At the request of Chair Cihacek, Mr. Johnson reviewed current watershed district <br />and city rules, with the city typically not as strict as those of the watershed <br />districts, particularly those of the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). Mr. <br />