My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-01-24_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
2017-01-24_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2017 9:22:14 AM
Creation date
3/1/2017 9:21:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/24/2017
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
View images
View plain text
Member Heimerl noted that in some cases (e.g. Saint Rose of Lima) a commercial <br />or institutional parking lot drainage problem may be a result of surrounding <br />residential properties and impervious coverage or grading of those lots versus the <br />parking lot creating the problem. Member Heimerl questioned what was the bigger <br />issue, noting that each home contributed to that runoff as well; and therefore, he <br />didn't want to hit businesses harder if not also addressing residential properties at <br />the same time. <br />In conclusion and without objection, Chair Cihacek directed staff to revise the <br />policy include a definition of "exposed aggregate;" noting that the majority of the <br />PWETC supported some elements of Options 2 and 3 pending current practices; <br />with Member Seigler pointing out the need to define "new" or somehow define <br />what accounted for activities on a site to trigger stormwater improvements; while <br />providing a defensible policy for enforcement. Chair Cihacek summarized that the <br />majority of the PWETC seemed supportive of a better standard based on current <br />policy and a clearer sense, with elements of Options 2 and 3, with Option 1 a must. <br />With consensus support by the PWETC, Mr. Freihammer advised that staff would <br />rewrite the ordinance with two different options, clarifying descriptions, and <br />resulting impacts under both options. <br />Specific to the next iteration coming before the PWETC, Mr. Johnson noted that <br />the sooner the better, as the intent was to make sure revisions were available to SEH <br />for their incorporation of that into the Surface Water Management Plan update in <br />process. <br />8. Items for Next Meeting — February 28, 2017 <br />Discussion ensued regarding the February agenda, moving the TIF discussion out <br />further as it wasn't a time -sensitive issue; including the Transportation Plan RFP <br />(anticipated in April, August and November); and deadlines for comments on the <br />Plan back to Mr. Johnson via email by February 20, 2017 for staff to incorporate <br />them into the February meeting packet. <br />9. Adjourn <br />Member Heimerl moved, Member Thumau seconded, adjournment of the meeting <br />at approximately 8:32 p.m. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Page 17 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).