Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 30,2017 <br /> Page 14 <br /> Finance Director Miller advised that the organizations submitted monthly reports <br /> for the city's review and monitoring, and would still be required to do so. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated her support for that reporting; with Mayor Roe <br /> observing that those organizations filed the reports frequently so they are familiar <br /> with the requirements. <br /> Section 304.03.B (Approval of Licenses) <br /> At the request of Councilmember Laliberte, Finance Director Miller clarified that <br /> the Gambling Control Board waited for municipal approval via form letter before <br /> completing their final approval process. <br /> Specific to youth athletics or activities, Councilmember Etten referenced infor- <br /> mation he'd received that an organization supporting those efforts may also use <br /> proceeds to fund their own operations (e.g. V.F.W. and/or B-Dale Club) and <br /> asked how to avoid pulling the rug out from their support if they are not 100% <br /> supporting youth activities, and protecting their operations in the city by not tak- <br /> ing away their current source of funding. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested not designating how or where the profits were expended, <br /> but just standard application across the trade area. <br /> City Attorney Gaughan cautioned that more specificity would cause the city to <br /> wade into a grey area. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated she was unsure as to whether she supported re- <br /> stricting profits to youth activities. While recognizing that there were many or- <br /> ganizations currently directing proceeds to that effort, Councilmember Laliberte <br /> noted there were also needs in the community among seniors and other groups <br /> and organizations needing to benefit from additional funding. <br /> Councilmember McGehee agreed that the funds should be open to all. <br /> Section 304.02, Items A. and D Page 3 (Number of Licenses and Permits) <br /> With the current maximum number of Premise Permits limited to eight, and each <br /> organization unable to conduct lawful gambling at more than two locations, <br /> Mayor Roe noted limitations at this point with current language. As part of that <br /> discussion, Mayor Roe questioned the purpose in limiting Premise Permits (e.g. <br /> control of vice-like activities or to avoid competition) and suggested that the mar- <br /> ket place determine how many Premise Permits there could be. Mayor Roe ques- <br /> tioned how many locations would want more than 2-3 entities conducting lawful <br /> gambling. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated that he would be fine with three locations per organi- <br /> zation as long as the number of Premise Permits was increased to at least ten. <br />