Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 30,2017 <br /> Page 6 <br /> For clarification purposes, Councilmember Etten noted that the issues and con- <br /> cerns initially brought up at the Har Mar Pet Shop were related to conditions of <br /> the site itself and not necessarily the sources of the animals housed at the store. <br /> With a number of breeding facilities throughout the country, he suggested it <br /> might be more appropriate to create a fee schedule and contract with a local vet- <br /> erinarian for monthly inspections to deal with breeder conditions. Councilmember <br /> Etten opined that ordinance as proposed did not deal with the initial concerns. <br /> While this may prove a relatively easy ordinance to adopt and enforce, Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten reiterated his concern that it didn't address the immediate con- <br /> cerns in the city. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that another similar option might be to contract with a city <br /> having more regulation resources to perform the same service for the City of Ro- <br /> seville, with cost recovery from related businesses depending on City Council <br /> agreement. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte suggested another way to identify what was being mon- <br /> itored would be to limit the number of animals in an enclosure, even if for adop- <br /> tion purposes, and the length of time they're there. If those issues were not ad- <br /> dressed, Councilmember Laliberte cautioned that it seemed to provide a way to <br /> avoid the system. <br /> Mayor Roe advised that this was his rationale in the provision to not allow board- <br /> ing animals overnight. If too many animals are housed in a cage during the day, <br /> Mayor Roe opined that this didn't seem to him as problematic as they would be <br /> boarded overnight in a store versus in a shelter where they're used to dealing with <br /> various situations. <br /> Councilmember McGehee recognized the issues brought forward by Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten, but stated that she wasn't sure she was willing to enthusiastical- <br /> ly embark on an inspection program of any frequency, noting there were three <br /> other pet stores using the adoption model in Roseville that had presented no prob- <br /> lems to-date. Councilmember McGehee stated that all would need to be inspected <br /> and fall under the same and consistent regulations; thus necessitating the need for <br /> additional inspections that she wasn't sure was feasible for the city or appropriate. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted that most shelter animals are only at another site <br /> for a few hours to be showcased for possible adoption, and then returned to their <br /> foster homes usually by their handlers. Councilmember McGehee opined that this <br /> ordinance would be the least expensive way to address a problem that had been <br /> brought to the city's attention. <br /> Councilmember Willmus also recognized Councilmember Etten's perspective; <br /> but beyond that, stated that he looked at the problem at the point of sale and be- <br /> yond and as a mechanism for animals arriving there in the first place. Coun- <br /> cilmember Willmus noted that the proposed ordinance dealt with a major number <br /> of those issues; thus his support for it as drafted. <br />