My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0213
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2017 10:00:50 AM
Creation date
3/2/2017 9:55:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/13/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 13,2017 <br /> Page 3 <br /> nance Facility, and other city storage needs was based on City Council direction <br /> at the December 5, 2016 City Council meeting. While recognizing that the cost <br /> may seem high, Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff felt it was worth a more detailed <br /> and professional review, with funds intended to come from the License Center <br /> and Building Replacement Funds. <br /> Especially p y re ar <br /> g ding the License Center and past City Council discussions, Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten asked for the value added from staff's perspective in hiring a <br /> firm beyond staff performing that analysis and recognizing federal mandates re- <br /> lated to the License Center. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon responded that the value added was that while staff can <br /> anticipate square footage needs to some degree, someone with more expertise was <br /> needed for a proper layout of that space, and to address applicable state and city <br /> codes; all toward the goal for providing better customer service efficiencies based <br /> on that guidance. Mr. Trudgeon noted that this also included taking a hard look at <br /> where a building might be located or relocated on a given site for the best ap- <br /> proach and taking into consideration parking and location of an elevator if adding <br /> stories. While staff could draw a box, Mr. Trudgeon opined that this analysis <br /> would provide more detail and visual preference options. <br /> While not disagreeing with the rationale, Council member Etten noted that the <br /> council had identified a likely location. Given that, he thought it was unwise to <br /> have concept plans drawn up for three locations. Despite having a likely location <br /> the city had no final location determined and Council member Etten felt it was <br /> probably getting the cart before the horse to have any drawings made. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that her understanding of this request was for a <br /> broader view of space needs campus-wide and how to fit storage into the picture, <br /> recognizing that the current arrangement at the maintenance facility may not be <br /> the best configuration. Councilmember McGehee stated that she was very much <br /> in favor of taking a 30,000-foot view of city space needs in general together with <br /> the current License Center location and their needs. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon confirmed that this analysis was intended to take current <br /> city storage needs scattered throughout the community into consideration as well. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated that she was also in favor of taking this broader <br /> view, opining that there was information currently lacking. If the City Council <br /> didn't take action on this request tonight, Councilmember Laliberte asked if there <br /> was an expiration date for quotes. <br /> While not necessarily impacting the quotes, City Manager Trudgeon advised that <br /> the only urgency was a desire on the city's part to push forward. With the next <br /> meeting of the City Council on February 27, 2017 being taken up by commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.