My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0213
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2017 10:00:50 AM
Creation date
3/2/2017 9:55:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/13/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 13,2017 <br /> Page 6 <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> C. Receive Update from City Council Sub-Committee on Commissions <br /> Speaking on behalf of Mayor Roe and herself serving as the subcommittee, Coun- <br /> cilmember Laliberte provided an update based on seven different meetings she <br /> and Mayor Roe held with fourteen various past and present commissioners on the <br /> Community Engagement Commission (CEC) and Human Rights Commission <br /> (HRC). Councilmember Laliberte noted that both commissions had very passion- <br /> ate commissioners on board who were very committed; and all agreed that more <br /> work could be accomplished with more people. Councilmember Laliberte ad- <br /> vised that both commissions were very interested in working on today's commu- <br /> nity needs, as well as in receiving more direction for that work. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte reported that the CEC felt good about their present <br /> work and felt they were a blank slate now, but expressed concern that past agen- <br /> das may have jaded their current efforts, Councilmember Laliberte noted that it <br /> had been identified and had come through loud and clear that the City Council's <br /> original effort in creating the CEC with a hands-off approach to allow them to <br /> make the commission their own, had failed to provide clear expectations. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte reported that both commissions had been asked to look <br /> at their current code and scope of duties and charge, while also working on their <br /> proposals for their future work as stand-alone commissions or if combined. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte reported that the HRC was appreciative of the addition- <br /> al commissioners now on board; with several comments from them that they felt <br /> they"did their own thing"without feeling connected to other city organizations or <br /> advisory groups, or to the City Council itself. <br /> With common themes heard from and among both commissions, and great feed- <br /> back from them, Councilmember Laliberte noted their intersecting goals,and <br /> points of connection and/or crossover. Councilmember Laliberte noted that a <br /> suggestion from the commissions had been their interest with the City Council <br /> Subcommittee on Commissions remaining in place to allow guidance for further <br /> direction or for initial refinement of recommendations and reporting before com- <br /> ing directly to the full City Council. <br /> In conclusion, Councilmember Laliberte suggested that it had been obvious that <br /> the city needed to make more effective use of both commissions; and recom- <br /> mended that the subcommittee be directed to further study a better balance for the <br /> advisory efforts of both the HRC and CEC. <br /> Mayor Roe agreed with Councilmember Laliberte's summary, noting especially <br /> the positive feeling among CEC commissioners about where they were at current- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.