My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0213
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2017 10:00:50 AM
Creation date
3/2/2017 9:55:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/13/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 13,2017 <br /> Page 8 <br /> ers from both commissions who remained interested in serving, followed by the <br /> normal process of commissioners not seeking reappointment and subsequently ar- <br /> riving at the ultimate number desired on the combined commission if not as many <br /> as the current full group. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated that he was in agreement with much of what he'd <br /> heard from the subcommittee tonight; but sought their ideas as to a timeline for <br /> implementation. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte responded that, while the subcommittee didn't come up <br /> with anything proscribed until having made this initial report to the City Council, <br /> based on feedback from the HRC and CEC, the sooner the better to the groups can <br /> get together their separate work plans to then determine their combined focus. <br /> Since the application process is underway with interviews and appointments soon, <br /> Councilmember Laliberte, with concurrence by Mayor Roe, opined that if it could <br /> happen by April 1, 2017 in conjunction with those appointments that would be <br /> ideal. <br /> Councilmember Etten agreed that the City Council hadn't provided good guid- <br /> ance; thus his 2016 request for the Policy Priority Plan (PPP) goal for commis- <br /> sions that never came to fruition. Based on his review of meeting minutes of both <br /> the CEC and HRC, Councilmember Etten stated his concern was that both groups <br /> had robust plans going forward and he wasn't sure how a combination of their ef- <br /> forts would work out. If this motion is approved, Councilmember Etten opined <br /> that there was an immediate need to inform that and work on the City Council's <br /> responsibility moving forward, cautioning that if it wasn't pursued, the same situ- <br /> ation could develop with a combined commission. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte agreed that had been on the minds of she and Mayor <br /> Roe as well; and how to get two passionate commissions on one track; recogniz- <br /> ing that may no happen instantly, suggesting that may be part of the subcommit- <br /> tees work to complete that work in progress. However, Councilmember Laliberte <br /> noted that, while the HRC was heavily involved in projects early in 2017, their <br /> plate will be somewhat cleared for the remainder of the year. Councilmember <br /> Laliberte noted that both the CEC and HRC had expressed their interest in up- <br /> coming summer community events and how their potential involvement. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that it was her understanding that part of the <br /> work of the subcommittee would be to ensure that smooth transition. Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee expressed her confidence in both commissions and their de- <br /> sire to work together, reiterating the considerable cross-over in the past that could <br /> easily continue. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.