My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_0217_FC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Finance Commission
>
Packet
>
2017_0217_FC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2017 12:08:14 PM
Creation date
3/9/2017 12:07:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Finance Commission Minutes <br />January 10, 2017 – Draft Minutes <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br />Commission would recommend for surplus cash from a budgetary standpoint and if the trends 136 <br />for each account would be lost in this type of transition. 137 <br /> 138 <br />Chair Schroeder stated these would be things the Commission could talk more about if they 139 <br />decided to move forward with the discussion. 140 <br /> 141 <br />Finance Director Miller stated this is a long-term dilemma of taking a complex system and 142 <br />simplifying it for others to understand. The City has struggled with this and realizes there are 143 <br />limitations on how far they can go. There are restricted funds, funds for transparency purposes, 144 <br />and management purposes and the City keeps these separated because the City wants to track 145 <br />revenue and expenditures separately and hold people accountable for managing their projects and 146 <br />budgets. If the account is created as Chair Schroeder is stating, then this would create a 147 <br />mechanism for the City to use funds that were raised for a specific purpose to be used for 148 <br />something else. This would be a change for the current culture and mindset of the City. 149 <br /> 150 <br />Commissioner Bachhuber stated the City would be good stewards if they did use these funds in 151 <br />other areas that may need it rather than leaving it in a fund that does not need it and raising taxes 152 <br />to cover the needs in another area. 153 <br /> 154 <br />Finance Director Miller stated this would impact the accountability because if a department is 155 <br />working hard to manage and reduce costs the City would use those excess funds for another 156 <br />purpose versus something the department is working towards. 157 <br /> 158 <br />Commissioner Murray stated changing the way things are reported makes comparing financial 159 <br />statements more difficult. 160 <br /> 161 <br />Commissioner Hodder stated the number of funds that could be included in this type of fund 162 <br />would be limited to those that are not restricted and this would reduce the amount of funds 163 <br />available for other areas and would only reflect the non-restricted funds surplus or deficit. 164 <br /> 165 <br />Commissioner Zeller stated this would be a big change in how the City reports and they could 166 <br />look at the General Fund to get this same information without having to do the transferring. 167 <br /> 168 <br />Chair Schroeder stated this could be added to a future agenda for additional discussion and 169 <br />consideration. 170 <br /> 171 <br /> 172 <br />Review Budget Comment Card Content & Layout 173 <br /> 174 <br />Finance Director Miller stated the Communications staff had put together the information that 175 <br />was sent out. The Council will determine if the City will send another comment card in 2017. 176 <br />He asked the Commission if there would be a better way to package and send out the information 177 <br />and comment card. In 2016 the comment card was included with the budget information and on 178 <br />the City’s website. 179 <br /> 180
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.