Laserfiche WebLink
ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />1 <br />DRAFT MEETING MINUTES FOR JUNE 7, 2016 <br />2 <br />ROSEVILLE CITY HALL – 6:30PM <br />3 <br />4 <br />PRESENT: <br />Becker-Finn, Bole, Diedrick, Gelbach, Heikkila, Newby, O’Brien, Stoner, <br />5 <br />Warzecha <br />6 <br />ABSENT: <br />7 <br />STAFF: <br />Anfang, Brokke, Christensen <br />8 <br />9 <br />1.INTRODUCTIONS <br />10 <br />11 <br />2.ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br />12 <br />No public comment at the start of the meeting. <br />13 <br />14 <br />rd <br />3.APPROVAL OF MINUTES –MAY 3MEETING <br />15 <br />Commission Recommendation: <br />16 <br />Commission Vice-ChairGelbach moved, CommissionerO’Brienseconded. Motion <br />17 <br />passed unanimously. <br />18 <br />19 <br />4.TREE REPLACEMENT FUND POLICY <br />20 <br />Brokke introduced City Planner Thomas Paschke and Interim Community Development <br />21 <br />DirectorKariCollins. Paschke and Collins provided a presentation on the Tree <br />22 <br />Replacement Fund Policy for the commission. <br />23 <br />Collins provided a background on the Tree Replacement Fund Policy: <br />24 <br />Fee collected is $500 per tree or up to a maximum of 10% of the fair market value <br />25 <br />of the property <br />26 <br />Money will be held in a separate account <br />27 <br />Funds will be utilized within two years <br />28 <br />A hierarchy will be utilized to determine the replacement installation locations <br />29 <br />The City Council will approve all tree replacement fund expenditures <br />30 <br />Collins indicated that funds should be utilized in the close vicinity of the project. Also, <br />31 <br />brought up Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) as an option to add into the hierarchy. <br />32 <br />Commission had a clarification discussion on the current process, fee determination, and <br />33 <br />surrounding cities fee structure for tree replacement. <br />34 <br />Paschke confirmed that the $500 amount was vetted by a third-party consultant. <br />35 <br /> <br />