My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-3-7_PR Comm Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
2017-3-7_PR Comm Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2017 4:18:24 PM
Creation date
4/5/2017 4:18:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The typical cost per sq. ft. for Clubhouse projects range from $380-$420. Based on this cost estimate a <br />3,200 sq. ft. building would cost $1,216,000 to $1,344,000. The larger 5,000 sq. ft. building would be <br />$1,900,000 to $2,100,000. These estimates are only for the building costs. They do not factor in site costs <br />(exterior gathering space, parking lot expansion, utilities and golf course modifications) or planning and <br />management costs (typically 7-10% of the total project cost). <br /> <br />The major difference in the two sq. ft. options are the size of the community gathering space. The larger <br />building (5,000 sq. ft.) would allow for 80-100 people in the gathering space. Whereas the 3,200 sq. ft. <br />building would accommodate 60 people – similar to Roseville’s current rentable Park Buildings. <br /> <br />Brokke reviewed the Cedarholm Advisory Team recommendations: <br /> <br />-Maximize use of current funding for Clubhouse, estimated amounts include: <br /> <br />Park Dedication: $1,300,000 <br />o <br /> <br />Renewal: $400,000 <br />o <br /> <br />Fund balance of the Golf Course: $200,000 <br />o <br /> <br />Estimated total of $1,900,000 <br />o <br /> <br />-Consider all funding options, including levy and bonding if necessary <br /> <br />-Partnerships/collaborations <br /> <br />-Consider gaps in Community Facilities and other uses <br /> <br />Consider not only the immediate future but also the long-term functionality <br />o <br /> <br />-Plan for supporting infrastructure <br /> <br />Consider ancillary areas during the planning process <br />o <br /> <br />Staff is planning to seek guidance from the City Council at their work session on Monday, March 20, 2017. <br />Topics of discussion will include the following: <br /> <br /> <br />Project Scope <br /> <br /> <br />Project Budget <br /> <br /> <br />Funding Sources <br /> <br /> <br />Historical Society Consideration <br /> <br /> <br />Other Discussion <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Brien noted that the Historical Society’s inclusion would impact the design of Cedarholm. <br />Vice-Commissioner Gelbach added that there could potentially be more visibility for the Historical Society <br />if it were part of the License Center. He also added that he would like to see the Cedarholm maintenance <br />project completed now, as it may be years before that aspect of the project could be completed in the future. <br /> <br />Brokke confirmed that the Roseville Historical Society is a valuable asset to the Community. They are <br />valued by the City of Roseville and the Parks and Recreation Department. To date, they have not had the <br />office and display space to flourish and potentially garner additional members. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed that the 3,200 sq. ft. building would meet the needs of Cedarholm as a <br />Clubhouse. However, the 5,000 sq. ft. building would fill a specific need for meeting space size due to the <br />100 person seating capacity, making it a Community Building that would be available to the Roseville <br />Community year-round. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Brien stated that there are two different visions or paths to consider when thinking about <br />next steps. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.