Laserfiche WebLink
17City of Roseville y Commissioner’s Handbook <br />The rules of procedure at meetings should <br />be simple enough for most people to un- <br />derstand. Unfortunately, that hasn’t always <br />been the case. Virtually all clubs, associa- <br />tions, boards, councils and bodies follow a <br />set of rules, Robert’s Rules of Order, which <br />are embodied in a small but complex <br />book. Virtually no one I know has actually <br />read this book cover to cover. <br />Worse yet, the book was written for an- <br />other time and purpose. If you are running <br />the British Parliament, Robert’s Rules of <br />Order is a dandy and quite useful hand- <br />book. On the other hand, if you’re running <br />a meeting of a five member body with a <br />few members of the public in attendance, <br />a simplified version of the rules of parlia- <br />mentary procedure is in order. Hence, the <br />birth of “Rosenberg’s Rules of Order.” <br />This publication covers the rules of <br />parliamentary procedure based on my 20 <br />years of experience chairing meetings in <br />state and local government. These rules <br />have been simplified and slimmed down <br />for 21st century meetings, yet they retain <br />the basic tenets of order to which we are <br />accustomed. <br />“Rosenberg’s Rules of Order” are support- <br />ed by the following four principles: <br />1. Rules should establish order. The first <br />purpose of the rules of parliamentary <br />procedure is to establish a framework <br />for the orderly conduct of meetings. <br />2. Rules should be clear. Simple rules <br />lead to wider understanding and <br />participation. Complex rules create <br />two classes: those who understand <br />and participate and those who do <br />not fully understand and do not fully <br />participate. <br />3. Rules should be user-friendly. That <br />is, the rules must be simple enough <br />that citizens feel they have been able <br />to participate in the process. 4. Rules <br />should enforce the will of the major- <br />ity while protecting the rights of the <br />minority. The ultimate purpose of the <br />rules of procedure is to encourage <br />discussion and to facilitate decision- <br />making by the body. In a democracy, <br />the majority rules. The rules must <br />enable the majority to express itself <br />and fashion a result, while permitting <br />the minority to also express itself (but <br />not dominate) and fully participate in <br />the process. <br />The Chairperson Should Take a <br />Back Seat During Discussions <br />While all members of the governing body <br />should know and understand the rules of <br />parliamentary procedure, it is the chairper- <br />son (chair) who is charged with applying <br />the rules of conduct. The chair should be <br />well versed in those rules, because the <br />chair, for all intents and purposes, makes <br />the final ruling on the rules. In fact, all <br />decisions by the chair are final unless over- <br />ruled by the governing body itself. <br />Because the chair conducts the meeting, <br />it is common courtesy for the chair to take <br />a less active role than other members of <br />the body in debates and discussions. This <br />does not mean that the chair should not <br />participate in the debate or discussion. <br />On the contrary, as a member of the body, <br />the chair has full rights to participate in <br />debates, discussions and decision-making. <br />The chair should, however, strive to be the <br />last to speak at the discussion and debate <br />stage, and should not make or second a <br />motion unless he or she is convinced that <br />no other member of the body will do so. <br />The Basic Format for an Agenda <br />Item Discussion <br />Formal meetings normally have a written, <br />published agenda; informal meetings may <br />have only an oral or understood agenda. <br />In either case, the meeting is governed by <br />the agenda and the agenda constitutes <br />the body’s agreed-upon road map for the <br />meeting. And each agenda item can be <br />handled by the chair in the following basic <br />format. <br />First, the chair should clearly announce <br />the agenda item number and should <br />clearly state what the subject is. The chair <br />should then announce the format that will <br />be followed. <br />Second, following that agenda format, <br />the chair should invite the appropriate <br />people to report on the item, including <br />any recommendation they might have. <br />The appropriate person may be the chair, <br />a member of the governing body, a staff <br />person, or a committee chair charged with <br />providing information about the agenda <br />item. <br />Third, the chair should ask members <br />of the body if they have any technical <br />questions for clarification. At this point, <br />members of the governing body may ask <br />clarifying questions to the people who <br />reported on the item, and they should be <br />given time to respond. <br />Fourth, the chair should invite public <br />comments or, if appropriate at a formal <br />meeting, open the meeting to public <br />input. If numerous members of the public <br />indicate a desire to speak to the subject, <br />the chair may limit the time of each public <br />speaker. At the conclusion of the public <br />comments, the chair should announce <br />that public input has concluded (or that <br />the public hearing, as the case may be, is <br />closed). <br />Fifth, the chair should invite a motion <br />from the governing body members. The <br />chair should announce the name of the <br />member who makes the motion. <br />Sixth, the chair should determine if any <br />member of the body wishes to second <br />the motion. The chair should announce <br />the name of the member who seconds <br />the motion. It is normally good practice <br />for a motion to require a second before <br />proceeding with it, to ensure that it is not <br />just one member of the body who is inter- <br />ested in a particular approach. However, <br />a second is not an absolute requirement, <br />and the chair can proceed with consider- <br />ation and a vote on the motion even when <br />there is no second. This is a matter left to <br />the discretion of the chair. <br />Seventh, if the motion is made and <br />seconded, the chair should make sure <br />everyone understands the motion. This is <br />done in one of three ways: <br />1. The chair can ask the maker of the <br />motion to repeat it; <br />2. The chair can repeat the motion; or <br />3. The chair can ask the secretary or <br />the clerk of the body to repeat the <br />motion. <br />Eighth, the chair should now invite discus- <br />sion of the motion by the members of <br />the governing body. If there is no desired <br />discussion or the discussion has ended, <br />the chair should announce that the body <br />will vote on the motion. If there has been <br />no discussion or a very brief discussion, <br />the vote should proceed immediately, and <br />there is no need to repeat the motion. <br />Appendix F. Rosenberg’s Rules of Order