Laserfiche WebLink
20 City of Roseville y Commissioner’s Handbook <br />If the motion to reconsider passes, then <br />the original matter is back before the <br />body, and a new original motion is in <br />order. The matter may be discussed and <br />debated as if it were on the floor for the <br />first time. <br />Courtesy and Decorum <br />The rules of order are meant to create an <br />atmosphere where the members of the <br />body and the members of the public can <br />attend to business efficiently, fairly and <br />with full participation. And at the same <br />time, it is up to the chair and the members <br />of the body to maintain common courtesy <br />and decorum. Unless the setting is very <br />informal, it is always best for only one <br />person at a time to have the floor, and it <br />is always best for every speaker to be first <br />recognized by the chair before proceeding <br />to speak. <br />The chair should always ensure that de- <br />bate and discussion of an agenda item fo- <br />cus on the item and the policy in question, <br />not on the personalities of the members <br />of the body. Debate on policy is healthy; <br />debate on personalities is not. The chair <br />has the right to cut off discussion that is <br />too personal, too loud or too crude. <br />Debate and discussion should be focused, <br />but free and open. In the interest of time, <br />the chair may, however, limit the time <br />allotted to speakers, including members <br />of the body. Can a member of the body <br />interrupt the speaker? The general rule <br />is no. There are, however, exceptions. A <br />speaker may be interrupted for the follow- <br />ing reasons: <br />Privilege. The proper interruption would <br />be: “Point of privilege.” The chair would <br />then ask the interrupter to “state your <br />point.” Appropriate points of privilege re- <br />late to anything that would interfere with <br />the normal comfort of the meeting. For <br />example, the room may be too hot or too <br />cold, or a blowing fan might interfere with <br />a person’s ability to hear. <br />Order. The proper interruption would be: <br />“Point of order.” Again, the chair would ask <br />the interrupter to “state your point.” Appro- <br />priate points of order relate to anything <br />that would not be considered appropriate <br />conduct of the meeting; for example, if <br />the chair moved on to a vote on a motion <br />that permits debate without allowing that <br />discussion or debate. <br />Appeal. If the chair makes a ruling that a <br />member of the body disagrees with, that <br />member may appeal the ruling of the <br />chair. If the motion is seconded and after <br />debate, if it passes by a simple major- <br />ity vote, then the ruling of the chair is <br />deemed reversed. <br />Call for orders of the day. This is simply <br />another way of saying, “Let’s return to the <br />agenda.” If a member believes that the <br />body has drifted from the agreedupon <br />agenda, such a call may be made. It does <br />not require a vote, and when the chair dis- <br />covers that the agenda has not been fol- <br />lowed, the chair simply reminds the body <br />to return to the agenda item properly <br />before them. If the chair fails to do so, the <br />chair’s determination may be appealed. <br />Withdraw a motion. During debate and <br />discussion of a motion, the maker of the <br />motion on the floor, at any time, may inter- <br />rupt a speaker to withdraw his or her mo- <br />tion from the floor. The motion is imme- <br />diately deemed withdrawn, although the <br />chair may ask the person who seconded <br />the motion if he or she wishes to make the <br />motion, and any other member may make <br />the motion if properly recognized. <br />Special Notes About Public Input <br />The rules outlined here help make meet- <br />ings very public-friendly. But in addition, <br />and particularly for the chair, it is wise to <br />remember three special rules that apply to <br />each agenda item: <br />Rule One: Tell the public what the body <br />will be doing. <br />Rule Two: Keep the public informed while <br />the body is doing it. <br />Rule Three: When the body has acted, tell <br />the public what the body did. <br />Public input is essential to a healthy de- <br />mocracy, and community participation in <br />public meetings is an important element <br />of that input. The challenge for anyone <br />chairing a public meeting is to accommo- <br />date public input in a timely and time- <br />sensitive way, while maintaining steady <br />progress through the agenda items. The <br />rules presented here for conducting a <br />meeting are offered as tools for effective <br />leadership and as a means of developing <br />sound public policy.