My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0417
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0417
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2017 11:43:13 AM
Creation date
5/10/2017 11:42:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/17/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, April 17, 2017 <br /> Page 8 <br /> nancial support. Councilmember McGehee noted that Ms. Thompson had spoken <br /> to the more basic values of Roseville; and opined that the general constituency <br /> didn't need something similar to the Shoreview Community Center and even <br /> though they may like it, didn't necessarily want one built in Roseville. As pointed <br /> out by Councilmember Willmus, Councilmember McGehee noted that the com- <br /> munity had gathering places, athletic facilities and gyms spread throughout the <br /> community; and opined that this more diverse arrangement seemed to suit the Ro- <br /> seville constituency well. <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted that the community center interest has been <br /> around a long time, but that the concern continued to be funding, and significant <br /> community preference that it be funded through operating receipts, which was not <br /> feasible as the City of Maplewood was now finding out. Councilmember <br /> Willmus opined that it was important to be candid with people at the front end, <br /> recognizing that a community center is not a revenue generator and operationally <br /> would lose money; raising the question as to whether or not the community was <br /> willing to pay for it long-term, a point at which the conversation seems to pause <br /> repeatedly. <br /> Board Chair Traynor noted the city's leadership with their Park Renewal Program <br /> and providing meeting space throughout the community; with the school district <br /> focusing on basic needs, with accessibility for the community and located in sites <br /> that make sense for the entire school district constituency and with a regional <br /> draw. <br /> With the community unwilling to pay for a community center, Board Member <br /> Boguszewski suggested this gave the school district pause in any consideration of <br /> adding to its referendum as an alternate funding source for such a community cen- <br /> ter. Board Member Boguszewski noted that any perception that the school dis- <br /> trict's referendum was moving beyond meeting basic needs would cause public <br /> concern and therefore he cautioned considerable thought in pursuing anything be- <br /> yond those basics. <br /> Councilmember Etten referenced those things listed in #6 beyond a community <br /> center, but things being used by students during the day and as the city considered <br /> with its Parks Master Plan process and subsequent facilities, the backlog that <br /> needed to be addressed. Councilmember Etten noted those included community <br /> use of facilities after school hours (e.g. pool, auditorium) and the different groups <br /> wanting use of those over-booked facilities, whether by the community or school. <br /> Councilmember Etten noted the need to take care of those basics and those com- <br /> munity assets based on their importance in the community for students and citi- <br /> zens. <br /> Board Member Boguszewski agreed with that perception as addressed by Coun- <br /> cilmembers Willmus and Etten, and identification line by line what is considered <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.