My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0424
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0424
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2017 11:47:23 AM
Creation date
5/10/2017 11:46:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/24/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 24, 2017 <br /> Page 15 <br /> growing pains to complete its work, Ms. Manke questioned the future of the com- <br /> bined effort. In hearing past comments made by the City Council that the CEC <br /> never brought anything forward, Ms. Manke opined that this wasn't true, noting <br /> three separate proposals recently brought forward, questioning if they had actually <br /> made it to the City Council's attention or if the City Council had reviewed CEC <br /> meeting minutes. Ms. Manke questioned if that had occurred, and then noted the <br /> City Council's desire for the CEC to dissolve without recognizing the efforts of <br /> those commissioners working hard and giving of their personal time. While there <br /> is a lot of overlap between the HRC and CEC, Ms. Manke stated that the CEC <br /> was more focused on community and civic engagement and had been working on <br /> some dynamic areas over the last few years. While the City Council made ap- <br /> pointments and reappointments to the HRC to bring it up to full membership <br /> again, Ms. Manke noted that the CEC was never given the same opportunity and <br /> even denied the opportunity to seek applications. <br /> Under these circumstances, Ms. Manke opined that the City Council had been ex- <br /> tremely unfair to the CEC, and questioned if anything had even been considered <br /> beyond the name issue tonight, and emphasizing "human rights" to the exclusion <br /> of other areas of focus. While the CEC hasn't had an opportunity to meet since <br /> this came forward, Ms. Manke noted that the HRC continued to do so. Therefore, <br /> Ms. Manke asked that the City Council reconsider bringing the CEC and HRC <br /> back to their full membership and let the CEC pursue their ongoing work tasks <br /> going forward. Ms. Manke stated that she'd welcome the Task Force's involve- <br /> ment and their input. <br /> Mary Englund, 224 N McCarron's Boulevard <br /> Given the considerable strong feeling on including "human rights" in the name of <br /> this new commission, and other comments, Ms. Englund opined that this may not <br /> be the night for decision-making and voting. As a citizen, Ms. Englund stated her <br /> understanding of human rights; and stated that she saw community engagement as <br /> something totally different; therefore not making sense to combine them with <br /> fewer rather than more people involved. Ms. Englund opined that it seemed bet- <br /> ter to have them remain separate rather than combining them, especially given to- <br /> night's feedback. <br /> Molly Slade, 2216 Fulham, former HRC Commissioner <br /> Ms. Slade spoke in opposition to the repeal and reorganization of the HRC; and <br /> provided a history of the State of Minnesota's Human Rights inception and role of <br /> the City of Roseville as one of the original municipalities involved in that state <br /> and local effort. Ms. Slade spoke in support of those basic human rights princi- <br /> ples to the state and city, and in welcoming the newest neighbor populations in a <br /> safe environment, including their municipal government. Recognizing the most <br /> recent quality and diverse applicant pool for one vacancy on the HRC, Ms. Slade <br /> opined that by removing "human rights" from the title and focus of a combined <br /> commission would be confusion and convey the wrong message at this time of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.