Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, April 10, 2017 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />At the request of his colleagues, Councilmember Willmus chose not to elaborate <br />other than noting previous mention of his concerns related to the process for mu- <br />nicipal approval of these types of licenses. <br /> <br /> Roll Call <br />Ayes: McGehee, Laliberte, Etten and Roe. <br />Nays: Willmus. <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />d. Declare Planning Commission Vacancy <br />City Manager Trudgeon briefly highlighted this request as detailed in the Request <br />for Council Action (RCA) and related attachments dated April 10, 2017 ; noting <br />that this was standard procedure as per the City Council’s direction to staff when <br />vacancies were declared on commissions. <br /> <br />While expressing disappointment that this newly-appointed commissioner would <br />be unable to serve, Councilmember McGehee noted the large pool of candidates <br />recently interviewed for commission vacancies, questioning if additional applica- <br />tions were actually needed. <br /> <br />Willmus moved, Laliberte seconded, declaring a vacancy on the Planning Co m- <br />mission, directing staff to advertise for an application deadline of May 10; with <br />interviews scheduled for May 15, and City Council appointment on May 22, <br />2017. <br /> <br />Councilmember Etten expressed his disappointment that the appointee would be <br />unable to serve, but hoped she would be able to reapply for a future vacancy. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe spoke in support of opening the process for any additional candidates <br />wishing to apply for the vacancy at this time. <br /> <br /> Roll Call <br />Ayes: McGehee, Willmus, Laliberte, Etten and Roe. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />e. Approve Resolution Rejecting Bids for 2017 Utility Project <br />City Manager Trudgeon briefly highlighted this request as detailed in the Request <br />for Council Action (RCA) and related attachments dated April 10, 2017; explain- <br />ing an error with the online bidding process, resulting in additional language upon <br />the advice of City Attorney Gaughan as outlined in lines 34-35 of the revised draft <br />resolution. Mr. Trudgeon noted that the online version of the resolution was co r- <br />rectly presented, but the printed version included in meeting packet materials was <br />outdated. <br />