Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 14, 2016 <br />Page 24 <br /> <br />may make more sense as a better option for the city given those pending issues, <br />and asked for staff’s feedback on that. <br /> <br />Mr. Culver advised that the Fire Station roof had been reviewed and what could <br />be installed, but noted that it would be a much smaller installation. Even with an <br />installation on the City Hall/Police Department and Public Works Maintenance <br />facilities, Mr. Culver advised that those sizes of installations were considered <br />“small potatoes” for Kenyon to work on; therefore the attempt was to make the <br />installation as large as possible. Mr. Culver reported that the only reason the city <br />was able have Kenyon consider this smaller project was that they were seeing it as <br />an extension of a larger system in the area. While it would not be impossible to <br />bring the Fire Station into the equation, Mr. Culver noted it would change the <br />economics. While not having gotten into much detail at this point, Mr. Culver <br />further reported that in initial discussions with City Manager Trudgeon, even if <br />the existing Public Works Maintenance facility was repurposed and the mainte- <br />nance function moved elsewhere, the shell of the building wouldn’t change and <br />simply involve walls and interior space reconfiguration and repurposing. Without <br />having talked to an architect on-site, Mr. Culver opined that adding a second floor <br />to the Public Works Maintenance facility as it is designed would be difficult and <br />expensive. <br /> <br />While agreeing that the Maintenance facility is basically a large garage, and also <br />agreeing that it probably wasn’t feasible to add a second floor, Mayor Roe noted <br />one outcome of the pending facilities study may be that the shell of the building is <br />no longer there; thus addressing the city’s risk level. <br /> <br />Mr. Culver agreed that may be a possibility; but opined it would be more cost- <br />effective to repurpose the existing building, after formal discussions with an ar- <br />chitect about that feasibility. Mr. Culver noted part of that could involve lowering <br />the tall ceilings of installing a false ceiling lower and repurposing the open space <br />into a License Center or some other use. However, Mr. Culver noted the intent <br />was that repurposing the building wasn’t necessarily exclusive for installation of <br />solar panels and keeping them operational for the twenty-five year term of the in- <br />stallation. <br /> <br />At the notice of Councilmember McGehee and previous discussions earlier today, <br />Mr. Culver advised that the preliminary financial analysis predictions of the twen- <br />ty-five years of the long-term PPA program shown as $105,000 (RCA, page 2, <br />line 39) was inaccurate, and was actually $242,000. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGehee further noted the exit clause detailed in line 98 of the <br />RCA and the projected $242,000 didn’t appeal to her; opining she liked the previ- <br />ous lottery program as a smaller experiment to begin with. <br /> <br /> <br />