Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 14, 2016 <br />Page 29 <br /> <br />Public Comment <br />Roger Hess, Jr. 1906 Wagner Place <br />Mr. Hess noted comparisons with other communities; but suggested a comparison <br />if the City of St. Paul was to take over the Roseville water system, as it did for <br />other suburbs. Mr. Hess opined that there must be a reason they use that system, <br />and asked staff to compare the current system versus St. Paul taking over the sys- <br />tem. Mr. Hess thanked Councilmember McGehee for out-of-the-box ideas <br />brought forward for consideration. Mr. Hess opined that it would be nice if other <br />Councilmembers brought forward similar ideas for consideration. <br /> <br /> <br />15.Business Items – Presentations/Discussions <br /> <br /> <br />a.Consider Changes to City Code, Chapter 314.05: the 2017 Fee Schedule <br />Finance Director Miller referenced an updated copy of the proposed 2017 Fee <br />Schedule, provided as a bench handout and replacing the schedule included as an <br />attachment to the RCA of today’s date. Mr. Miller noted the revised schedule in- <br />cluded some fees inadvertently omitted in the previous draft, along with addition- <br />al corrections upon further staff review. Mr. Miller noted that most fees are <br />grouped by department, and included more recommended changes this year given <br />staff’s detailed review line by line. Mr. Miller advised that the fees were intended <br />to be representative of actual city costs in providing a particular service. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe asked that staff go through the document with the items highlighted as <br />new and/or revised fees. Finance Director Miller deferred to Departments Head <br />available and related rationale for the proposed fee changes. Individual Coun- <br />cilmembers asked questions of Department Heads as applicable during the presen- <br />tation. <br /> <br />Public Works Department (page 2) <br />curb stop turn-on/off <br />Mr. Culver noted a new fee for fees, shown as a trip fee; <br />estimating approximately 30-40 annually at this time, but unsure of how that may <br />increase without an identified way to recoup city staff and equipment resources <br />involved. <br /> <br />erosion control escrow fee <br />Mr. Culver noted this had been brought to the City <br />Council’s attention earlier this fall for clarification, with staff putting numbers to <br />ideas and establishing new thresholds involving the need for erosion control per- <br />mits at an amount less than the current fee and involving smaller things in the <br />city’s shoreline district. Mr. Culver advised the intent was to ensure that staff was <br />able to monitor these areas without charging the full fee for residents and smaller <br />projects and of less than one-quarter acre (e.g. minor grading, etc.). <br /> <br />Fire Department (page 3 & 4) <br />commercial vent hood inspections, <br />Fire Chief O’Neill addressed the increase in <br />stand-alone temporary fireworks salesinspections of underground fuel <br />, and <br /> <br />