CC_Minutes_2016_11-14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, November 14, 2016 Page 8 Councilmember McGehee voiced a different perspective based on a Conditional Use addressing screening for an entire site and the role of the City Council and Planning Commission in reviewing those applications. Councilmember McGehee noted that a condition could be imposed by either body for no trailer storage on whatever side is chosen and a determination made at that time. Councilmember McGehee questioned if she was supportive of that being part of the Variance pro- cess, but instead supported it as part of an overall site plan review that would not only provide more flexibility for conditioning a Conditional Use, but allow the City Council some control over those conditions as well versus consideration by only the Variance Board. Councilmember Willmus referenced the meeting minutes from the October 5, 2016 Planning Commission and their reference to different definitions related to principle uses and things to be vetted by the City Council subsequent to that meet- ing; and the Commission’s tabling any action after concerns had been expressed by them that this additional language change had not yet been properly vetted by staff, nor had it received any public feedback as it hadn’t been part of the initial staff request for text amendments. Councilmember Willmus asked if staff was aware of any other text amendments potentially yet to be addressed; with Mr. Paschke responding that he was not aware of any others at this point. Mayor Roe reviewed the options available for the City Council to consider to- night. Mayor Roe stated his concern in removing the language altogether as re- quested by the applicant’s legal counsel speaking tonight was there was then no reminder that it was an important point to consider. Therefore, Mayor Roe stated that he would not be supportive of removing that reference completely. Councilmember Willmus stated his reluctance as well to taking the language out completely, depending on what the city preferred and what direction they wanted to move forward with related to outdoor storage. When reviewing this issue, Councilmember Willmus stated that he got a sense that some of the controls in place for the city and future land use were no longer available if the language was struck; noting his concerns with that ramification. From the other perspective, Councilmember McGehee asked what would be ame- nable if there was a selected primary street by definition that would serve as a flag for staff to address with any other abutting streets. Mayor Roe clarified that he also preferred to err on the side of leaving the lan- guage as recommended by staff, allowing the City Council to retain some flexibil- ity if they so desired. McGehee moved, Etten seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1514 (Attachment C) entitled, “An Ordinance Amending Roseville City Code, Table 1005-1 and amended as follows: Section 1009.02.D of Title 10 (Zoning Ordinance);”