Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 8, 2017 <br /> Page 10 <br /> Mayor Roe sought the City Council's interest in applying a penalty for the lack of <br /> up-to-date training records; with no interest shown in doing so. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Etten, McGehee, Laliberte and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> Recess <br /> Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 8:04 p.m., and reconvened at approximately <br /> p.m. <br /> f. Review and Provide Comment on the First Two Chapters of a Comprehensive <br /> Technical Update to the Requirements and Procedures for Processing Subdi- <br /> vision Proposals as Regulated in City Code, Title 11 (Subdivisions) <br /> (PROJ0042) <br /> As detailed in the RCA dated April 24, 2017 (tabled to tonight's meeting), Senior <br /> Planner Bryan Lloyd reviewed the process in this first iteration of a side-by-side <br /> comparison of current subdivision code and preparation revisions. In the review of <br /> the first two chapters, Mr. Lloyd noted that consultant and staff comments and sug- <br /> gested revisions, as well as Planning Commission discussions of the first two chap- <br /> ters were reflected in this draft for City Council review and comment. Except in <br /> those areas highlighted, Mr. Lloyd advised that the majority of the revisions repre- <br /> sent replacement or removal of outdated language, definitions needed or no long <br /> relevant, and other updates as indicated. Mr. Lloyd also noted that while the more <br /> important details remain in the subdivision code, staff was recommending reloca- <br /> tion of more technical (e.g. street types and specifications) in documents outside <br /> city code for easier and more periodic updating. Mr. Lloyd advised that this was in <br /> response to the City Council's interest in a more streamlined process but greater <br /> depth of detail similar to the preliminary plat application process, and thus ap- <br /> proached similarly. <br /> With the Planning Commission just having completed their review of the remaining <br /> chapters, a second look at the first two chapters at their May 3, 2017 meeting, and <br /> meeting minutes pending, Mr. Lloyd advised that a more formalized version and <br /> those minutes would be available for the City Council at their next review, May 15, <br /> 2017. <br /> As to the proposed formatting and drafting of a new subdivision code, Mr. Lloyd <br /> advised that the intent was that, since platting alternatives are more concentrated in <br /> the last chapter of the current subdivision code, they would now be encompassed <br /> in a process-focused chapter. Therefore, Mr. Lloyd advised that revisions from the <br /> fourth chapter and final chapter of current code were not located in another portion <br /> of code that the City Council would see tonight unless found unnecessary to retain. <br /> While there remain three chapters yet to review, Mr. Lloyd advised that all content <br /> of current code would and could be accounted for in the new proposed code in some <br /> way. <br />