2017-04-18_EDA_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville REDA Workshop Tuesday, January 17, 2017 Page3 1 is Park 2 Affordable home prices lower in Roseville due to smaller housing types 3 Future transportation (e.g.driverless cars) and transit option impacts to development 4 of the community 5 What defines an “urban city” and a “suburb” since the initial concept after the post- 6 World War II war building boom period and current reality and previous develop- 7 ments based on vehicular access versus today’s walkability preferences and conven- 8 ience to amenities 9 Roseville’s status of becoming less a suburb every day as a trend with most inner-ring 10 suburbs. 11 12 Further discussion and dialogue included: 13 How Roseville fits into the metropolitan marketplace, with recent industrial construc- 14 tion considered good, creating a good tax base and more jobs, some recent ho- 15 tel/motel construction; but not a lot of office use constructed of late. 16 While there has been a huge increase in multi-family units in the metropolitan area 17 over the last few years, why none in Roseville? 18 Consideration of the demographics of where employees are coming from and what’s 19 attracting them, and how to address competition from other communities that will 20 continue to increase going forward. 21 Consideration of multi-family housing closer to Rosedale Center (not allowed for 22 with current zoning designation). 23 The need for flexibility on the part of the City of Roseville for redevelopment and in- 24 fill development (e.g. outlots or parking lots at malls); and willingness to partner with 25 developers –not with a master plan but with a vision for the future of the community 26 that will attract developers to the community. 27 Challenges –and opportunities –of major highways with access to Roseville and how 28 to redevelop as a walkable versus vehicular community. 29 More efficient use of office space by many companies versus new construction or re- 30 development; and comparably efficiencies in land use to provide amenities for em- 31 ployees in today’s market and for residential uses as well. 32 Mixed use not successful without each component able to succeed on its own. 33 Financial investments in larger density projects to make them work based on potential 34 rents; creating the need for flexibility by the city in zoning and partnering with devel- 35 opers including investing financially. 36 How Roseville sells itself in the future based on community needs and the develop- 37 ment marketplace and project viability. 38 How to address those Roseville residents ready to move from theircurrent single- 39 family home to a single-level townhome, but not into a senior apartment complex at 40 this stage of their lives. 41 How limited land availability in Roseville informs future development and redevel- 42 opment by removing barriers, including financial and/or site assembly investments; 43 tax increment financing and creative ideas to send a message to developers that it 44 wants to partner to make a project happen. 45 Changing the community’s mentality that by partnering with a developer it achieves a 46 public improvement whether with housing or area redevelopment or other amenities;