2017-5-2_PR Comm Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Commissioner Hoag questioned if it is a possibility to negotiate the buildout of a park with the developing contractor. Brokke explained that the Roseville Parks and Recreation Department does not negotiate Park Dedication. However, an example of land dedication where the developer worked with the city to develop a park would be Applewood Park and Overlook. Vice-Chair O’Brien questioned the additional language that was added. Specifically, the addition of the sidewalks, pathways and trails reference concerns her, as it is too broad. Commissioner Stoner stated that he believes that the addition of trails is a good thing and could assist with the connection of parks and trails in the city. Brokke reiterated that trails are a high priority in the community. However, as Park Dedication is unpredictable you would want to be careful on how much to expand the ordinance, as the fund may be stretched too thin. Commissioner Baggenstoss and Chair Gelbach relayed that they have reservations about expanding the existing language and potentially creating conflict between multiple departments over the funds. Commissioner Baggenstoss requested information on how the trails are currently funded in Roseville. Brokke answered that there is a pathway fund managed by Public Works. However, the fund may not be funded to the level needed. Commissioner Hoag asked where the changes are at in the process. Brokke confirmed that they are the recommendations provided by the Consultant and have not been solidified. Commissioner Hoag agreed that limiting the options and that keeping Park Dedication simple is the best option. Vice-Chair O’Brien questioned what the next step would be to address the Commissions concerns with the Consultants Proposals. Should the concerns be voiced to the City Council? Commissioner Stoner revisited his position about the addition of trails as a positive. He stated that after the discussion he does not believe that trails should be added as an option for Park Dedication monies. Chair Gelbach reiterated that he was concerned about the changes. Commissioner Baggenstoss added that opening up the language makes the ordinance no longer a guiding principle. Commissioner Baggenstoss inquired about the removal of the 10% and 5%. The Commission agreed that the specific land dedication percentages need to be included and that the proposed language needs to be narrower and less open to negotiation. ii. Parks and Recreation Section Currently the Parks, Open Space and Recreation section of the Comprehensive Plan contains:  Introduction  Goals and policies  Park classification system  Designations of individual parks, open spaces and recreational facilities  Issues and potential improvements