My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0522
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0522
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2017 8:09:16 AM
Creation date
6/8/2017 2:51:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/22/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 22, 2017 <br /> Page 9 <br /> Specific to walkabouts, Councilmember McGehee asked if there was a starting <br /> point for those wishing to provide feedback but unable to perform the walkabout. <br /> Ms. Purdu confirmed that starting locations were indicated on all post card and <br /> maps. <br /> Ms. Purdu reviewed next steps for the Planning Commission and staff, with the <br /> most immediate effort now in drafting a future land use map with them to prompt <br /> additional community feedback. Ms. Purdu advised that additional time would be <br /> spent on evaluating districts themselves, how they're currently described and the <br /> densities behind them; along with identifying key redevelopment parcels (e.g. Har <br /> Mar Mall site). <br /> Councilmember Willmus asked that this update remain cognizant of the amount <br /> of property currently guided for high density residential (HDR) designation and <br /> review prior designations as to their continued appropriateness. <br /> Mayor Roe agreed, suggesting the consultants and staff review past City Council <br /> meeting minutes for those extensive discussions and interest in focusing on sever- <br /> al areas of opportunities and other areas of ongoing concerns not currently pro- <br /> posed to change in the near future and to help inform the process. <br /> Councilmember McGehee reiterated her concern that those immediately impacted <br /> by changes in zoning designation needed to provide their feedback and not leave <br /> it up to the City Council and Planning Commission. Councilmember McGehee <br /> also asked for a review of the current definition between Regional and Communi- <br /> ty Business districts, as addressed by the City Attorney in a previous opinion and <br /> needing to be revised. <br /> Ms. Purdu advised that that last issue was currently being reviewed in-house by <br /> staff and her consulting team. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte echoed the comments of her colleagues, noting the <br /> many conversations held about the amount of HDR and need for more variations <br /> in housing types in Roseville to avoid residents moving to other communities of- <br /> fering those preferred options, even though residents didn't want to leave Rose- <br /> ville,but didn't have a choice at this point. <br /> Specific to localized meetings and discussions, Mayor Roe agreed with Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee's point to seek feedback from residents in areas of potential <br /> conflict specifically where changes are proposed - before it gets to the Planning <br /> Commission or City Council for final consideration of the 2040 comprehensive <br /> plan update. <br /> In conclusion, Ms. Purdu reviewed the decision-making rubric initially discussed <br /> at the beginning of the process, using the outline of the Imagine Roseville 2025 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.