My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-05-23_PWETCPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2017
>
2017-05-23_PWETCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2017 9:32:34 AM
Creation date
6/28/2017 9:28:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/23/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
411 <br />412 <br />413 <br />414 <br />415 <br />416 <br />417 <br />418 <br />419 <br />420 <br />421 <br />422 <br />423 <br />424 <br />425 <br />426 <br />427 <br />428 <br />429 <br />430 <br />431 <br />432 <br />433 <br />434 <br />435 <br />436 <br />437 <br />438 <br />439 <br />440 <br />441 <br />442 <br />443 <br />444 <br />445 <br />446 <br />447 <br />448 <br />449 <br />450 <br />451 <br />452 <br />453 <br />454 <br />455 <br />456 <br />8. <br />9. <br />Roseville PWET Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Page 10, April 25, 2017 <br />excavation outside a home's original footprint. Mr. Culver advised that this also <br />provided an opportunity for the city to address erosion control issues, also when a <br />site is re -graded, and allowed staff to know what was occurring on sites within the <br />city and inspect the work being done. Mr. Culver advised that the city took in <br />numerous escrow and management fees annually, but during his tenure he only <br />remembered one case where the city used escrow funds to take corrective actions. <br />Mr. Johnson advised that the city's escrow and permit renewal fees were outlined <br />and refunded at the end of a project. <br />Vegetation Cost/Benefit Analysis <br />Given the lateness of the hour and since it wasA-sejsuggested tabling this discussion to a future meet <br />Motion <br />Member Trainor moved, seconded by <br />to the next available PWETC a2endad <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Items for Next Meeting — May <br />Discussion ensued re arding the <br />item: <br />■ Update rganic lectin <br />as part s co unicat <br />■ The reauire a e�4ally <br />ozniak, <br />itive, Chair Cihacek <br />this item <br />and time required for each <br />to be provided for the next few months <br />PK4S4 Public Hearing scheduled for May, <br />of 30-45 minutes for the report and to hear <br />Planythemprehensive <br />tant discussions over the next few PWETC <br />of Plan Update process (June/July), and <br />sision on the Pathway Master Plan (July) including <br />ment opportunities <br />elopment Department attendance at the May PWETC <br />meetin update and information on Tax Increment Financing (TIF) <br />Districts <br />Tour Op ions, possibly in August or via a special meeting to organize a field <br />trip in late afternoon or early evening at a specific construction project site of <br />interest to the PWETC <br />Possible tour of the Eureka Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) <br />Member Trainor suggested a more formal introduction and brief bios of each <br />member at the May PWETC meeting for the benefit of Member Misra. <br />10. Adjourn <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.